ExxonMobil in Chad and Cameroon*
Teaching Notes
Synopsis
In November 1999, ExxonMobil and its CEO Lee Raymond had to determine what
course of action to take after two major partners, Royal Dutch/Shell and France’s
TotalFinaElf, withdrew from the Chad-Cameroon Oil and Pipeline Project. The project
was enormously complex, involving billions of dollars in potential revenue, with a wide
variety of stakeholders, an array of critics, and a potentially volatile political and social
environment. The situation was further complicated by the history of oil extraction in
developing countries and the unbridled corruption that had inevitable ensued. Shell’s and
Elf’s pullout threatened to sideline the whole operation and seemed to give credence to
those critics who thought that the environmental and human costs of oil exploration and
extraction in the extremely poor countries of Chad and Cameroon were too great.
Raymond and ExxonMobil had to decide whether to proceed with the project.
Objectives
While a greater conscientiousness of the interactions between business and the
environment has grown in recent years, it is important to note that business and the
environment have always impacted each other. How can ExxonMobil balance the
interests of the Chadian and Cameroonian citizens, the two countries’ indigenous people,
the environment, and development? What are the ethical issues and sources of ethical
guidance involved in ExxonMobil’s decision-making process?
Students should be encouraged to consider the interests and roles of the various
stakeholders involved. Stakeholders here can refer to:
1. Direct Parties: ExxonMobil, the governments of Chad and Cameroon
For the stakeholders, this project can potentially result in much progress and in much
Questions for Discussion
1. How should managers think about the environment as part of their decision-
making? How much should it matter and how should it be incorporated?
2. If ExxonMobil is truly committed to the environment, is this the last place they
should be drilling or exactly where they belong? For those who say they should
leave, where else is it OK to drill for oil? For those who say stay, is there
anywhere that ExxonMobil should not drill for oil?