actions before they take place, making reasoned moral judgments about those
consequences, and choosing the actions that are the most “right” or do the least harm.
Chapter 8 will investigate some of the criteria used to decide “right” from “wrong,” but
this chapter provides a series of important ethics questions, including “what is?” “what
ought to be?” “how do we get from what is to what ought to be?” and “what is our
motivation?” Contemplating theses questions will help managers make decisions that
encourage ethical behavior, especially the normative question of “what ought to be?”
2. Question: To demonstrate that you understand the three models of management ethics –
moral, immoral, and amoral – give an example from your personal experience of each
type. Do you agree that amorality is a serious problem? Explain.
Answer: Immoral management entails knowingly deciding to engage in “wrong” actions,
often ones that harm others in some way. Moral management, on the other hand, consists
of making moral judgments to do the “right” thing. Immoral management often
concentrates on measures of profitability to the exclusion of other criteria, while moral
management incorporates profit as one of several criteria in making a decision. Finally,
scheme to defraud investors of over $50 billion is another example of immoral
management. Examples of amoral management might include a police department that
puts height and weight restrictions in place for police officers. While the department may
believe that it has a legitimate reason to use height and weight requirements and does not
intend to discriminate in its employment practices, it may fail to recognize the inherent
ethical issues with this practice. The management at Starbucks could be considered moral
management. The company pursues economic goals, while striving to operate within the
confines of the law and focusing on activities that will improve the well-being of its
employees, suppliers and the community in general.