e. Introducing theories not included in the original four: revolutionary,
developmental, democratic-socialist (whose nations tend to rank highest in the Freedom
House press freedom surveys), and Asian approaches.
g. Making the transition into professionalism, the second part of Chapter 3. A
short debate (“Resolved: Mass media have no obligation to anyone other than
themselves”) can help students find the pros and cons of feeling an obligation to others,
which is one facet of most definitions of “professionalism.”
i. Introducing occupational sociologists’ definitions of professionalism.
j. Showing how, by those definitions, media practitioners are not professionals.
(There’s no systematic body of knowledge, no barriers to entry, little to no authority,
and limited autonomy when compared to more traditional professions.)
k. Recasting the discussion of professionalism under Karen Lebancqz’s
philosophic definition of professionalism: “What we expect of professionals is not