2. Question: Explain the pros and cons of corporate philanthropy, provide a brief history of
corporate philanthropy, and explain why and to whom companies give.
Answer: Arguments for community involvement and philanthropy center on the fact that
business has the resources and expertise to help meet social needs. Many also note that
business should be responsible for the problems that it creates. In addition to these factors,
it also is important to note that these activities also can help the firm and its employees
through increased employee morale, better firm reputation, etc. Arguments against these
3. Question: Differentiate among strategic philanthropy, cause-related marketing, and cause
branding. Provide an example of each not discussed in the text.
Answer: Strategic philanthropy is the process of tailoring a firm’s giving to best fit with its
own mission and goals, by making contributions that hold the promise of helping the
firm’s financial goals, giving to causes that align with corporate activities, and explicitly
planning the giving process. An office supply store might make contributions to a school
by donating discontinued supplies and equipment. Cause-related marketing is the direct
linking of a business’s product or service to a specified charity. Each time a consumer uses
the service or buys the product, a donation is given to the charity by the business. Some
4. Question: Identify and discuss briefly what you think are the major trade-offs that firms
face as they think about offshoring and reshoring. When substantial layoffs are involved,
what are firms’ responsibilities to their employees and their communities?
Answer: The major tradeoff that most managers never address is the decision to increase
profits, which primarily benefit shareholders and senior managers, at the expense of
workers’ incomes. This tradeoff is not addressed because the managers have effective
control of the corporation and have a way to enrich themselves, and shareholders are a