25
Chapter Eleven: Fair Shares: Dividing the Value Added
Learning Objectives of Chapter Eleven
1. Recall the definition of moral desert.
3. Describe how utilitarianism can be used as a theory of justice.
5. Discuss the social contract theory.
6. Evaluate the strengths and weaknesses of the different theories of justice
SUMMARY: Chapter Eleven addresses the question of whether inequalities matter. The
more. Utilitarianism is analyzed as a possible theory of justice. Libertarianism and
social contract theory are also introduced.
A Particular Right-Claim: Fairness and Executive Compensation
Do inequalities in the world matter morally? Businesses most directly affect income
distribution through choices about compensation. Executive compensation is
controversial, because of the large incomes relative to others.
Two meanings of deservingness:
Is it distributively just?
Moral desert: benefits that properly accrue to us as rewards for something we
have or have not done.
Two problems with deservingness:
Whether we can deserve anything at all
Utilitarianism As a Theory of Justice
Justice and fairness are a part of well-being in utilitarianism, which generally ignores
distribution. Utilitarianism recognizes well-being as the only currency and measures
that currency only through additive aggregation.