6. How would your answers to questions 2, 3, and 4 differ (if at all) when the chart is
redrawn and filled in to reflect changes in relationships based on molecular
evidence?
The answers to questions 2 and 3 would not change. Some of the evolutionary trends
7. In biological terms, a group of organisms is said to be successful if it is represented
by a large number of species or if the mass of all the organisms in the group is large.
(In both cases, “large” is determined relative to other groups or organisms.) Given
this definition of success, which of the major groups of animals would you argue is
the most successful? Be sure to provide evidence for your argument.
Answers may vary depending on the criteria chosen. For example, did you choose
success based on the total mass of organisms, the total number of organisms, or the
Activity 32.2/33.2 What factors affect the evolution of organisms
as they become larger?
In the evolution of life on Earth organisms have evolved from single celled to multicelled;
small to large; simpler to more complex. Keep in mind, that this apparent increase in
complexity occurs because evolution adds on to or modifies what already exists.
As you discovered in Activity 27.2, surface-area-to-volume ratios and the need for
organisms to gain or lose substances across their surface areas have put constraints on the
evolution of cell structure and function. These same constraints affect the ability of
multicellular organisms to survive. Given their small size, most of the evolution in
unicellular organisms has involved changes in cell chemistry and/or internal cellular
structure. In contrast the evolution of larger and larger multicellular organisms is
evidenced primarily as changes in both external and internal morphology.
1. A quick review and extension of Activity 27.2: How has small size affected
prokaryotic diversity?
Activity 32.2/33.2 229