120 Berk/DeMarzo, Corporate Finance, Fourth Edition, Global Edition
©2017 Pearson Education, Ltd.
a. As shown in Table 8.6, the cost of outsourcing has an NPV of -$19,510. The cost of in-house
assembly, given the $6 million setup and $92/unit assembly cost, has total NPV of -$20,167, as shown
below:
In-HouseAssembly 0 1 2 3 4 5
Units(000s) 100.0 100.0 100.0 100.0
Cost/unit $92.0 $92.0 $92.0 $92.0
EBIT ($6,000) ($9,200) ($9,200) ($9,200) ($9,200) $0
IncomeTax 40.0% 2,400 3,680 3,680 3,680 3,680 –
UnleveredNetIncome (3,600) (5,520) (5,520) (5,520) (5,520) –
Inc.inNWC 6.67% 613 – – – (613)
FreeCashFlow (3,600) (4,907) (5,520) (5,520) (5,520) (613)
NPV 12.0% (20,167)
Note: NWC = -15% x (9200) for payables, + 1/12 x (9200) for inventory = -6.67% (9200) = –613
The difference between the two alternatives is therefore 20,167 – 19,510 = $657 (NPV, in $000s).
Therefore, because the cost of outsourcing is proportional to the unit price, the outside supplier could
raise its price by 657/19,510 = 3.37% to 1.0337x $110/unit = $113.71/unit before Cisco would be
indifferent.
b. The after-tax cost of in-house production is $3,600 for setup and an additional present value of 20,167
– 3,600 = $16,567 for actual production costs. Comparing production costs only, we see that in-house
production is actually 19,510 – 16,567 = $2943 cheaper than outsourcing given a volume of 100,000
units. For the savings from production costs to offset the setup costs, volume would need to increase
by 657/2943 = 22.324% to 1.22324 x 100,000 = 122,324 units before Cisco would be indifferent.
8-14. One year ago, your company purchased a machine used in manufacturing for $90,000. You have
learned that a new machine is available that offers many advantages; you can purchase it for
$150,000 today. It will be depreciated on a straight-line basis over 10 years, after which it has no
salvage value. You expect that the new machine will contribute EBITDA (earnings before
interest, taxes, depreciation, and amortization) of $50,000 per year for the next 10 years. The
current machine is expected to produce EBITDA of $21,000 per year. The current machine is
being depreciated on a straight-line basis over a useful life of 11 years, after which it will have no
salvage value, so depreciation expense for the current machine is $8,182 per year. All other
expenses of the two machines are identical. The market value today of the current machine is
$50,000. Your company’s tax rate is 38%, and the opportunity cost of capital for this type of
equipment is 12%. Is it profitable to replace the year–old machine?
Replacing the machine increases EBITDA by 50,000 – 21,000 = 29,000. Depreciation expenses rise by