17. In April 2009, the growth rate of M1 fell to 6.1%, while the growth rate of M2 rose to 10.3%.
In September 2013, the year-over-year growth rate of the M1 money supply was 6.5%, while
the growth rate of the M2 money supply was about 8.3%. How should Federal Reserve
policymakers interpret these changes in the growth rates of M1 and M2?
During the period in question, the M1 growth rate fell by 0.4%, while the M2 growth rate
increased by 2.0%. Because these growth rates moved in opposite directions, it is difficult to
18. Suppose a researcher discovers that a measure of the total amount of debt in the U.S.
economy over the past twenty years was a better predictor of inflation and the business cycle
than M1 or M2. Does this discovery mean that we should define money as equal to the total
amount of debt in the economy?
Not necessarily. Although the total amount of debt has predicted inflation and the business
cycle better than M1 or M2, it may not be a better predictor in the future. Without some
ANSWERS TO APPLIED PROBLEMS
Q.19 The table below shows hypothetical values, in billions of dollars, of different forms of
money.
a. Use the table to calculate the M1 and M2 money supplies for each year, as well as the
growth rates of the M1 and M2 money supplies from the previous year.
b. Why are the growth rates of M1 and M2 so different? Explain..