occurs whenever actual prices or usage of inputs are less than the standard prices or usage. An
unfavorable (U) variance occurs whenever actual prices or usage of inputs are greater than the standard
prices or usage.
The direct materials price variance (MPV) can be calculated at one of two points: (1) when the direct
materials are purchased or (2) when they are issued into production. Computing the MPV at the point of
purchase is preferable. The direct materials usage variance (MUV) will be calculated when materials are
used in the production of products. Cornerstone 9.2 (p. 452) is a good example of calculating the direct
materials price and usage variances.
The direct labor (rate) variance (LRV) computes the difference between what was paid to direct laborers
and what should have been paid. The direct labor efficiency variance (LEV) measures the difference
between the direct labor hours that were actually used and the direct labor hours that should have been
used. Cornerstone 9.3 (p. 456) illustrates how to compute the direct labor rate and efficiency variances.
Materiality will determine whether variances are large enough to be investigated. If a variance is
significant, an investigation is required to find out why a variance occurred and who is responsible for the
variance. Investigating, however, is costly and should be undertaken only if the benefits from corrective
action exceed the costs of investigating and taking corrective action. Because it is difficult to estimate the
costs and benefits of investigation, managers may investigate only if the variance is outside some
predetermined acceptable range. The top and bottom measures of the allowable range are referred to as
upper and lower control limits. These limits are determined by taking the standard and adding or
subtracting the allowable deviation.
Immaterial variances are generally charged to Cost of Goods Sold. Significant variances can be either
closed or prorated among Work in Process, Cost of Goods Sold, and Finished Goods.
Exercise 9.20 is a good problem for illustrating the calculation of direct materials and direct labor
variances and the preparation of the journal entries in a standard costing system.
Teaching hint: Discuss the issue of responsibility as the computation of each variance is described.
Explain why the normal assignment of responsibility can change as the variance is analyzed. Also, ask
when a manager might decide to change the standard after an investigation has been completed.
Remember, one reason for a variance can be that the standard is too tight or too loose.
IV. VARIANCE ANALYSIS: OVERHEAD COSTS
The total overhead variance is the difference between the actual overhead and the applied overhead. As
with the direct materials and direct labor variances, this total variance is also broken down into
component variances. First, overhead is divided into variable and fixed overhead categories, and then two
variances are computed for each category. Cornerstone 9.6 (p. 464) shows the calculation of the total
variable overhead variance.
The variable overhead variances are the variable overhead spending variance and the variable overhead
efficiency variance. The variable overhead spending variance measures the aggregate effect of
differences in the actual variable rate (AVOR) and the standard variable overhead rate (SVOR). The
variable overhead efficiency variance measures the change in variable overhead consumption that occurs
because of efficient (or inefficient) use of direct labor. These variances are calculated in a similar manner
to the way in which direct materials and direct labor variances are computed. Cornerstone 9.7 (p. 466) is a
good illustration here.