8-35
*Denominator level (Annual) in pounds of material: 410,000 × 0.3 = 123,000 pounds
Annual Budgeted Fixed Overhead: 123,000 × $14/lb = $1,722,000
Monthly budgeted FOH: $1,722,000 / 12 = $143,500
2. The direct materials price variance indicates that DDC paid more for brass than they had
planned. If this is because they purchased a higher quality of brass, it may explain why they used
less brass than expected (leading to a favorable material efficiency variance). In turn, because
variable manufacturing overhead is assigned based on pounds of materials used, this directly led
to the favorable variable overhead efficiency variance. The purchase of a better quality of brass
may also explain why it took less labor time to produce the doorknobs than expected (the
favorable direct labor efficiency variance). Finally, the unfavorable direct labor price variance
could imply that the workers who were hired were more experienced than expected, which could
also be related to the positive direct material and direct labor efficiency variances.
8-30 (30 min.) Comprehensive variance analysis.
Chef Whiz manufactures premium food processors. The following are some manufacturing
overhead data for Chef Whiz for the year ended December 31, 2014:
Budgeted number of output units: 588
Planned allocation rate: 3 machine-hours per unit
Actual number of machine-hours used: 1,170
Static-budget variable manufacturing overhead costs: $72,324
Required:
Compute the following quantities (you should be able to do so in the prescribed order):
1. Budgeted number of machine-hours planned
2. Budgeted fixed manufacturing overhead costs per machine-hour
3. Budgeted variable manufacturing overhead costs per machine-hour
4. Budgeted number of machine-hours allowed for actual output produced
5. Actual number of output units
6. Actual number of machine-hours used per output unit
SOLUTION