*PROBLEM 7.14 (Continued)
(b)
November 30
Cash …………………………………………………………………
1,400.00
Interest Revenue ……………………………………….
1,400.00
Office Expense (bank charges) …………………………..
Cash …………………………………………………………
Accounts Receivable …………………………………………
Cash …………………………………………………………
*PROBLEM 7.15
(a) The entries for the issuance of the note on January 1, 2020:
The present value of the note is: $1,200,000 X .68058 = $816,700
(Rounded by $4).
Botosan Company (Debtor):
Cash ………………………………………………………………
816,700
Discount on Notes Payable …………………………..
Notes Payable ……………………………………………
National Organization Bank (Creditor):
Notes Receivable …………………………………………….
Discount on Notes Receivable …………………….
Cash ……………………………………………………….
(b) The amortization schedule for this note is:
SCHEDULE FOR INTEREST AND DISCOUNT AMORTIZATION
EFFECTIVE-INTEREST METHOD
$1,200,000 Note Issued to Yield 8%
Date
Cash
Paid
Interest
Expense
Discount
Amortized
Carrying
Amount of
Note
1/1/20
$ 816,700
12/31/20
1,028,807
12/31/23
0
12/31/24
1,200,000
*PROBLEM 7.15 (Continued)
(c) The note can be considered to be impaired only when it is probable
(d)
The loss is computed as follows:
Carrying amount of loan (12/31/21) …………………………..
$952,599a
Loss due to impairment …………………………………………..
December 31, 2021
National Organization Bank (Creditor):
Bad Debt Expense …………………………………….
317,535
Allowance for Doubtful Accounts …………
TIME AND PURPOSE OF CONCEPTS FOR ANALYSIS
CA 7.1 (Time 1015 minutes)
Purposeto provide the student with the opportunity to discuss the deficiencies of the direct write-off
CA 7.2 (Time 1520 minutes)
Purposeto provide the student with the opportunity to discuss the accounting for cash discounts,
CA 7.3 (Time 2530 minutes)
Purposeto provide the student with the opportunity to discuss the advantages and disadvantages of
CA 7.4 (Time 2530 minutes)
Purposeto provide the student the opportunity to discuss when interest revenue from a note receivable
CA 7.5 (Time 2025 minutes)
Purposeto provide the student with a discussion problem related to notes receivable sold without and
with recourse.
CA 7.6 (Time 2030 minutes)
Purposeto provide the student the opportunity to account for a zero-interest-bearing note exchanged
CA 7.7 (Time 2530 minutes)
Purposeto provide the student the opportunity to calculate interest revenue on an interest-bearing
CA 7.8 (Time 2530 minutes)
Purposeto provide the student with a case related to the imputation of interest. One company has
CA 7.9 (Time 2530 minutes)
Purposeto provide the student with a case to analyze receivables irregularities, including a shortage.
This is a good writing assignment.
CA 7.10 (Time 2530 minutes)
SOLUTIONS TO CONCEPTS FOR ANALYSIS
CA 7.1
(a) The direct write-off method overstates the trade accounts receivable on the balance sheet by
reporting them at more than the net amount expected to be collected. Furthermore, because the
write-off often occurs in a period after the revenues were generated, the direct write-off method
CA 7.2
(a) 1. Kimmel should account for the sales discounts at the date of sale using the net method by
2. There is no effect on Kimmel’s sales revenues when customers do not take the sales discounts.
Kimmel’s net income is increased by the amount of interest (discount) earned when customers
do not take the sales discounts.
(b) Trade discounts are neither recorded in the accounts nor reported in the financial statements.
CA 7.2 (Continued)
Kimmel should report interest revenue from the notes receivable on its income statement for the
CA 7.3
(1) Allowances and charge-offs. Method (a) is recommended. In the case of this company which
has a large number of relatively small sales transactions, it is practicable to give effect currently to
(2) Collection expenses. Method (a) or (b) is recommended. In the case of this company, one strong
argument for method (a) is that it is advisable to have the Bad Debt Expense account show the full
amount of expense relating to efforts to collect and failure to collect balances receivable. On the
(3) Recoveries. Method (c) is recommended. This method treats the recovery as a correction of a
previous write-off. It produces an allowance account that reflects the net experience with bad
CA 7.4
Part 1
CA 7.4 (Continued)
Part 2
(a) The allowance method based on the balance in accounts receivable is consistent with the expense
recognition principle. It attempts to value accounts receivable at the amount expected to be
collected and records bad debt expense in periods when credit quality decreases. The method is
CA 7.5
(a) The appropriate valuation basis of a note receivable at the date of sale is its discounted present
value of the future amounts receivable for principal and interest using the customer’s market rate
of interest, if known or determinable, at the date of the equipment’s sale.
(b) Corrs should increase the carrying amount of the note receivable by the effective-interest revenue
CA 7.6
(a) 1. It was not possible to determine the machine’s fair value directly, so the sales price of the
2. Rolen reports 2019 interest revenue determined by multiplying the note’s carrying amount at
September 30, 2019 times the buyer’s market rate of interest at the date of issue, times three
twelfths. Rolen should recognize that there is an interest factor implicit in the note, and this
interest is recognized with the passage of time. Therefore, interest revenue for 2019 should
include three months’ revenue. The rate used should be the market rate established by the
original present value, and this is applied to the carrying amount of the note.
CA 7.7
(a) 1. For the interest-bearing note receivable, the interest revenue for 2020 should be determined by
2. For the zero-interest-bearing note receivable, the interest revenue for 2020 should be deter-
mined by multiplying the carrying value of the note by the prevailing rate of interest at the date
of the note by one third (September 1, 2020, to December 31, 2020). The carrying value of the
note at September 1, 2020, is the face amount discounted for two years at the prevailing interest
CA 7.7 (Continued)
(d) Because the trade accounts receivable were factored on a without recourse basis, the factor is
CA 7.8
The controller of Engone Company cannot justify the manner in which the company has accounted for
the transaction in terms of sound financial accounting principles.
Central to the transaction is the issue of imputed interest. If we assume that an arm’s-length exchange
has taken place, then the zero-interest-bearing feature masks the question of whether a gain, no gain
or loss, or a loss occurred.
For a gain to occur, the interest imputation must result in an interest rate of about 5% or less. To
illustrate:
CA 7.9
To: Mark Price, Branch Manager
From: Accounting Major
Date: October 3, 2020
Subject: Discrepancy in the Accounts Receivable Account
While performing a routine test on accounts receivable balances today, I discovered a $2,000
discrepancy. I believe that this matter deserves your immediate attention.
To compute the overage, I determined that the accounts receivable balance should have been based
Note to Instructors: This situation could result from 1) Collins colluding with a customer, or 2) a
lack of segregation of duties where Collins is also involved with collections.
CA 7.10
(a)
(1) Steps to Improve
Accounts Receivable Situation
(2) Risks and Costs Involved
Establish more selective credit-
This policy could result in lost sales and
CA 7.10 (Continued)
(1) Steps to Improve
Accounts Receivable Situation
(2) Risks and Costs Involved
Establish a more rigorous col-lection
policy either through external
This policy may offend current
customers and thus risk future sales.
(b) No, the controller should not be concerned with Marvin Company’s growth rate in estimating the
allowance. The accountant’s proper task is to make a reasonable estimate of uncollectible
accounts. In making the estimate, the controller should consider the previous year’s writeoffs and
FINANCIAL REPORTING PROBLEM
(a) Under “Cash Equivalents” in its notes to the consolidated financial
statements, P&G indicates:
(b) P&G has $5,569 billion in cash and cash equivalents. As disclosed in
(c) As indicated in Note 1, the company’s products are sold primarily
through retail operations including mass merchandisers, grocery
stores, membership club stores, drug stores, department stores, salons,
COMPARATIVE ANALYSIS CASE
(a) Cash and cash equivalents: ($ millions) at year-end 2017:
Coca-Cola, PepsiCo,
(b) Accounts receivable (net):
Coca-Cola,
PepsiCo,
$3,667
$7,024
(c) Accounts Receivable turnover ratio and days outstanding for
receivables:
Coca-Cola
PepsiCo
FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS CASE 1
(a) Cash may consist of funds on deposit at the bank, negotiable instru
ments such as money orders, certified checks, cashier’s checks,
personal checks, bank drafts, and money market funds that provide
checking account privileges.
(c) A compensating balance is that portion of any cash deposit main-
tained by an enterprise which constitutes support for existing borrow
ing arrangements with a lending institution.
(d) Short-term investments are investments held temporarily in place of
cash which can be readily converted to cash when current financing
needs make such conversion desirable. Examples of short-term invest
FINANCIAL STATEMENT ANALYSIS CASE 1 (Continued)
(e) Occidental would record a loss of $30,000,000 as revealed in the
following entry to record the transaction: