Ethical Obligations and Decision Making in Accounting, 4/e 19
reduction in earnings management. Earnings management was assessed as the frequency
of small profits compared to small losses, a technique used in past studies. Australia,
France, and the United Kingdom were selected for examination, as these three countries
were unable to adopt IFRS before the 2005 mandatory transition date, thus eliminating any
early adoption benefits. According to their research, earnings management remained
consistent in Australia and the United Kingdom after IFRS adoption. However, in France,
earnings management appeared to increase, suggesting that earnings quality was not
improved overall by adopting IFRS.
19. In the Enron case, the company eventually turned to “back–door” guaranteeing of
the debt of Chewco, one of its SPEs, to satisfy equity investors. Assume that a $16
million loan agreement required that Enron stock should not fall below $40 per
share. If the share price did decline below that trigger amount, either the loan would
be called by the bank or the bank could choose to increase the guaranteed number
of Enron shares based on the new price (assume $32). If the bank decides to increase
the number of shares guaranteed, what would be (1) the original number of shares
in the guarantee and (2) the new number of shares? Why would it be important
from an accounting and ethical perspective for Enron to disclose information about
the guarantee in its financial statements?
By guaranteeing the SPE’s debt, Enron was still at risk for repayment of the SPE’s debt
thereby failing to transfer the risk. At a minimum, the situation should have been fully