P a g e | 19
Business & Professional Ethics for Directors, Executives & Accountants, 8e
From 1997 to 2004, Chiquita admitted that it paid approximately $1.7 million to the United Self-Defense
Forces of Columbia (AUC in Spanish), a right-wing paramilitary group. Through its subsidiary, Banadex,
Chiquita made more than 100 monthly payments, often in cash, to the AUC, which were recorded as
being for security services. As control of the banana-growing region shifted, Chiquita then made
Useful Articles, Links, and Videos
“Chiquita Brands International” (November 30, 2010). New York Times,
McQuillen, William (April 15, 2010). “Chiquita Faces New Claims Over Colombia Terrorism.” Bloomberg,
Leonning, Carol (August 2, 2007) “In Terrorism–Law Case, Chiquita Points to U.S.” Washington Post,
7. The Case of Cesar Correia (Chapter 3, page 181)
What this case has to offer
This is a true story of a young man who committed a crime, went to jail, served his time, began a career
in computers and started a business with a colleague. He is now being penalized a second time. Is that
fair? This case lends itself easily to analyses based on the theory of rights, justice as fairness,
utilitarianism and virtue ethics.
Teaching suggestions
Rather than have the students read the case, I give them the basic facts contained in the first paragraph,
the setting up of Infolink Technologies and the lawsuit. I have them vote on whether or not George has