Accounting Chapter 24 Homework To close overhead variances to Cost of Goods Sold.

subject Type Homework Help
subject Pages 11
subject Words 2600
subject Authors Jan Williams, Joseph Carcello, Mark Bettner, Susan Haka

Unlock document.

This document is partially blurred.
Unlock all pages and 1 million more documents.
Get Access
page-pf1
g.
651,504
h.
498
PROBLEM 24.4A
SVEN ENTERPRISES (concluded)
Overhead Spending Variance (favorable)
Entry to close overapplied overhead to cost of goods sold:
Entry to transfer the 147 batches of puppy meal produced in April to finished goods:
Finished Goods Inventory (at standard cost)
page-pf2
a. =
b. =
45 Minutes, Strong
Materials Price Variance
PROBLEM 24.5A
SLICK CORPORATION
Actual Quantity Used × (Standard Price - Actual Price)
Labor Rate Variance
Actual Labor Hours × (Standard Rate - Actual Rate)
page-pf3
c.
$2,600
d. (1) 21,125 *
325
(2) 60,000 *
(4) 91,125
91,125*
Finished Goods Inventory (at standard cost) ………………………….
$2,200
Work in Process Inventory (at standard cost) ………………………………
Work in Process Inventory (at standard cost) ……………………………
Work in Process Inventory (at standard cost) …………………………
Materials Quantity Variance (unfavorable) ………………………..
Fixed
Fixed
Costs Applied
Overhead
Problem 24.5A
SLICK CORPORATION (concluded)
Overhead variances:
Actual Overhead
Costs Incurred
Standard Overhead
Costs Allowed
page-pf4
40 Minutes, Strong PROBLEM 24.6A
POLYGLAZE, INC.
a. Materials price variance:
Actual Quantity × (Standard Price - Actual Price)
(8,000 units × 11 ounces) × ($0.15/oz. - $0.16/oz.) (880)$ Unfavorable
Materials quantity variance:
Journal entry to record direct materials used in June:
Work in Process Inventory (8,000 units × 10 oz. × $0.15/oz.) 12,000
b. Labor rate variance:
Actual Hours × (Standard Hourly Rate - Actual Hourly Rate)
(8,000 units × .45 hr.) × ($10.00/hr. - $10.40/hr.) (1,440)$ Unfavorable
Labor efficiency variance:
Journal entry to record direct labor cost for June:
Work in Process Inventory (8,000 units × 0.5 hr. × $10/hr.) 40,000
Labor Rate Variance 1,440
page-pf5
PROBLEM 24.6A
POLYGLAZE, INC. (concluded)
c. Overhead spending variance:
Overhead per flexible budget—8,000 units:
Fixed 5,000$
Variable (8,000 units × $0.50 per unit) 4,000
Overhead volume variance:
Overhead applied at standard cost (8,000 units × $1) 8,000$
Journal entry to record overhead applied to work in process:
Work in Process Inventory (8,000 units × $1 per unit) 8,000
page-pf6
PROBLEM 24.7A
HERITAGE FURNITURE CO.
a. (1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
40 Minutes, Strong
Computation of materials price variance (MPV):
Computation of labor efficiency variance (LEV):
Computation of labor rate variance (LRV)
Computation of materials quantity variance (MQV):
page-pf7
PROBLEM 24.7A
HERITAGE FURNITURE CO. (continued)
(5) Computation of overhead spending variance:
Overhead per flexible budget for 800 units:
Fixed 15,000$
(6) Computation of volume variance:
Overhead applied using standard cost
($800 units × $22 per unit) 17,600$
Overhead per flexible budget for 800 units
b.
General Journal
July 31 Work in Process Inventory (at standard) 104,000
Materials Quantity Variance 10,400
To record direct materials used during July.
Standard cost = 800 units @ $130 = $104,000
Actual cost = 800 units @ $132 = $105,600
To charge July production with direct labor cost.
31 Work in Process Inventory (at standard) 17,600
Volume Variance 3,000
page-pf8
PROBLEM 24.7A
HERITAGE FURNITURE CO. (concluded)
c.
The company appears to be having significant problems in two areas. First, the large
unfavorable materials quantity variance ($10,400) indicates that far more material is being
used in the production process than is provided for in the cost standards. Assuming that
The favorable materials price variance may mean that the purchasing department is
purchasing lower-grade materials than normal and perhaps contributing to the large
Comments on cost variances:
page-pf9
a.
b.
c.
d.
60 Minutes, Strong
PROBLEM 24.8A
RIPLEY COPRORATION
Based on the journal entry to charge direct material costs to work in process, the standard
quantity of material allowed for the actual level of output achieved in June is determined as
follows:
Based on the journal entry to charge direct materials costs to work in process, the actual
quantity of material purchased and used during June is determined as follows:
Based on the journal entry to charge direct labor costs to work in process, the standard direct
labor hours allowed during June is determined as follows:
Based on the journal entry to charge direct labor costs to work in process, the average per
hour labor cost incurred in June is determined as follows:
page-pfa
e.
f. 154,000
g. 5,000
8,200
1,200
Overhead Volume Variance (favorable) ………………………………
Materials Quantity Variance (unfavorable) …………………………………………
Materials Price Variance (favorable) ………………………………….
Finished Goods Inventory (at standard cost)
Problem 24.8A
RILEY CORPORATION (concluded)
page-pfb
a.
c. =
440
$ 1,040
Total overhead allowed …………………………………………………………………………….
Variable overhead allowed ($2 × 220 units) …………………………………………………………….
Labor Rate Variance
Actual Labor Hours × (Standard Rate - Actual Rate)
PROBLEM 24.9A
ANTON COMPANY
45 Minutes, Medium
Since the direct materials quantity variance is $0, the actual quantity of materials used per
stand must equal the budgeted quantity per stand. Thus, the total quantity purchased and
used is:
page-pfc
b.
c. 30,400
1,600
SOLUTIONS TO PROBLEMS SET B
25 Minutes, Strong
PROBLEM 24.1B
UNDEM
The materials quantity variance (MQV) is first used to find the standard quantity of material
allowed for producing 950 units (MQV is half MPV):
Materials Quantity Variance (unfavorable) …………………………………….
Work in Process Inventory (1,520 pounds × $20 per pound) …………………………..
page-pfd
PROBLEM 24.2B
DYELOT INDUSTRIES
a.
30 Minutes, Medium
Computation of materials price variance (MPV):
Computation of materials quantity variance (MQV):
Computation of labor rate variance (LRV):
Computation of labor efficiency variance (LEV):
page-pfe
PROBLEM 24.2B
DYELOT INDUSTRIES (concluded)
a. (continued)
Computation of overhead spending variance:
Overhead budgeted for 400 batches:
Fixed 150,000$
Variable (400 batches × $20 per batch) 8,000
b.
General Journal
Jan. 31 Work in Process Inventory (at standard) 320,000
Materials Quantity Variance 8,000
Materials Price Variance 20,500
Materials Inventory (actual) 307,500
31 Work in Process Inventory (at standard) 64,000
Labor Rate Variance 1,590
Labor Efficiency Variance 400
Direct Labor (actual) 62,010
To record direct labor cost applicable to January
production:
page-pff
25 Minutes, Medium PROBLEM 24.3B
LATIN SILK PRODUCTS
a.
General Journal
(1) Work in Process (standard cost) 50,000
Materials Quantity Variance 5,000
Materials Price Variance 1,000
Direct Materials Inventory (actual cost) 54,000
To record materials used.
(2) Work in Process (standard cost) 47,000
Labor Efficiency Variance 4,000
(3) Work in Process (standard cost) 56,400
Overhead Spending Variance 600
Overhead Volume Variance 3,000
Manufacturing Overhead (actual cost) 60,000
To record manufacturing overhead assigned to
production, and to record overhead variances.
b. (1) Finished Goods Inventory (at standard cost) 80,000
(2) Cost of Goods Sold (at standard cost) 72,000
Finished Goods Inventory (at standard cost) 72,000
To record cost of units sold, 9,000 units at $8 per unit.
page-pf10
a. =
b. =
=
=
$625 Favorable
Labor Rate Variance
Actual Labor Hours × (Standard Rate - Actual Rate)
2,500 hours × ($8.25 - $8.00*)
45 Minutes, Strong
Materials Price Variance
Actual Quantity Used × (Standard Price - Actual Price)
PROBLEM 24.4B
HANS ENTERPRISES
page-pf11
c.
Overhead
Costs Applied
d.
e.
19,800 *
f.
5,120
700
PROBLEM 24.4B
HANS ENTERPRISES (continued)
Overhead variances:
Actual Overhead
Costs Incurred
Costs Allowed
Standard Overhead
Entry to charge direct labor to production:
Work in Process Inventory (at standard cost) …………………………………
Entry to charge materials to production:
Entry to charge overhead to production:
Work in Process Inventory (at standard cost) …………………………………..
Overhead Spending Variance (favorable) …………………………………………………….

Trusted by Thousands of
Students

Here are what students say about us.

Copyright ©2022 All rights reserved. | CoursePaper is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university.