BYP 23-3 REAL-WORLD FOCUS
(a) According to Mr. LaFaive, zero-based budgeting requires that the
existence of a government program or programs be justified in each
fiscal year, as opposed to simply basing budgeting decisions on a
previous year’s funding level. Zero-based budgeting is often encouraged
by fiscal watchdog groups as a way to ensure against unnecessary
spending.
(b) In addition to saving money and improving services, zero-based
budgeting may:
• Increase restraint in developing budgets;
• Reduce the entitlement mentality with respect to cost increases; and
• Make budget discussions more meaningful during review sessions.
(c) On the cost side of the equation, zero-based budgeting:
• May increase the time and expense of preparing a budget;
• May be too radical a solution for the task at hand. You don’t need a
sledgehammer to pound in a nail;
• Can make matters worse if not done in the right way. A substantial
commitment must be made by all involved to ensure that this
doesn’t happen.
(d) In Oklahoma, which has recently adopted zero-based budgeting, officials
are applying the method to two departments and several agencies each
year. Once those reviews are complete, the same departments and
agencies will not see another zero-based review for eight years.