(a) Wise’s net income is $215,000 ($900,000 – $450,000 –$150,000 –
$10,000 – $75,000).
(b) Wise’s 2014 working capital of $470,000 ($700,000 – $230,000) is over
4 times as high as Omaz’s working capital of $105,000 ($180,000 – $75,000).
(c) Omaz appears to be less solvent. Omaz’s 2014 debt to assets ratio of
34% ($265,000 ÷ $780,000)a is slightly higher than Wise’s ratio of 29%
($430,000 ÷ $1,500,000)b. The lower the percentage of debt to assets, the
lower the risk that a company may be unable to pay its debts as they
come due.