481
CHAPTER 15
CAPITAL INVESTMENT ANALYSIS
CLASS DISCUSSION QUESTIONS
1. The principal objections to the use of the
average rate of return method are its failure
to consider the expected cash flows from the
proposals and the timing of these flows.
4. The cash payback period ignores the cash
flows that occur after the cash payback peri-
od; the net present value method includes
all cash flows in the analysis. The cash pay-
back period also ignores the time value of
money, which is included by the net present
value method.
5. A one-year payback will not equal a 100%
average rate of return because the payback
period is based on cash flows; the average
rate of return is based on income. The de-
preciation on the project will prevent the two
methods from being equal.
8. The $115,000 net present value indicates
the proposal is desirable because the pro-
posal is expected to recover the investment
and provide more than the minimum rate of
return.
9. The net present values indicate both projects
are desirable but not necessarily equal in
desirability. The present value index can be
used to compare the two projects. For
the method assumes the cash received from
the proposal during its useful life will be re-
invested at the rate of return used to com-
pute the present value of the proposal. This
assumption may not always be reasonable.
11. The computations for the internal rate of
return method are more complex than those
for the methods that ignore present value.
Also, the method assumes the cash received
from the proposal during its useful life will be
reinvested at the internal rate of return. This
assumption may not always be reasonable.
12. Allowable deductions for depreciation.
should be considered.