Exercise 13–16 (30 minutes)
1. The relevant costs of a hunting trip would be:
Travel expense (100 miles @ $0.21 per mile) .
Shotgun shells ………………………………………
One bottle of whiskey …………………………....
Total …………………………………………………..
2. If Bill gets lucky and bags another two ducks, all of his costs are likely to
be the same as they were on his last trip. Therefore, it doesn’t cost him
anything to shoot the last two ducks. If he were to use more shotgun
3. In a decision of whether to give up hunting entirely, more of the costs
listed by John are relevant. If Bill did not hunt, he would not need to
pay for: gas, oil, and tires; shotgun shells; the hunting license; and the
whiskey. In addition, he would be able to sell his camper, equipment,
boat, and possibly pickup truck, the proceeds of which would be
considered relevant in this decision. The original costs of these items are
not relevant, but their resale values are relevant.