Ebenezer is CEO of a successful small business. One day he stops by to see Tim Cratchit, the
new branch manager at First National Bank. Ebenezer and his partner Marley would like to
double the size of their loan with the bank from $500,000 to $1 million. Ebenezer explains,
“Business is booming, sales and earnings are up each of the past three years, and we could
certainly use the funds for further business expansion.” Tim Cratchit has a big heart, and
Ebenezer has been a close friend of the family. He thinks to himself this loan decision will be
easy, but he asks Ebenezer to email the past three years’ financial statements as required by bank
policy.
In looking over the financial statements sent by Ebenezer, Tim becomes concerned. Sales
and earnings have increased just as Ebenezer said. However, receivables, inventory, and
accounts payable have grown at a much faster rate than sales. Further, he notices a steady
decrease in operating cash flows over the past three years, with negative operating cash flows in
each of the past two years.
Who are the stakeholders, and what is the ethical dilemma? Do you think Tim should go
ahead and approve the loan?
Key Issues
• What was it in Tim’s analysis of the financial statements that caused him concern?
• Should Tim go ahead and approve the loan?
Option 1: Approve the loan
• The business has been successful in the past.
• Ebenezer already has an established business relationship with the bank based on the
Option 2: Deny the loan
• Doubling the loan size will increase the risk of default.
• Receivables, inventory, and accounts payable have grown at a much faster rate than sales,
while operating cash flows have steadily decreased over the past three years.