(a) Investors rely on auditors to perform an independent assessment of a
company. If the auditor owns stock in that company, he or she might
not be able to act in an independent and impartial manner.
(b) There are pros and cons to this argument. On the positive side, it
could be argued that as long as a person has no direct relationship
with a client company, that person will not influence the findings of the
(c) The fact that four firms have become so big means that prohibiting
employees of those accounting firms from buying stock in clients of
the firm would bar those employees from investing in roughly 25% of
publicly traded firms. Some have argued that such restrictive rules
would create undue hardship, and unfairly restrict the investment
(d) Answers to this question will vary. This is a particularly difficult issue
since the rule effectively eliminates the individual’s control over their
investment portfolio. They did nothing wrong when they bought the
shares, but now they are being forced to sell when it is not advantageous.
(e) The management of PricewaterhouseCoopers noted that auditor inde-
pendence is vitally important to the audit function. If investors don’t