Instructor Resource
Trager, The Law of Journalism and Mass Communication 6e
CQ Press, 2018
discretion imposed by the canons of statutory construction. In setting up the assignment, first
introduce students to the following key concepts of statutory construction:
a. The legislative intent for the law, as expressed by the plain meaning of the statutes’
words, should determine interpretation of the law.
b. If words are not defined in the law, they should be interpreted according to their
ordinary meaning.
c. The law should be interpreted holistically. Thus, subsections of a law should be
interpreted within the context of the whole statute and ambiguities resolved to achieve
consistency.
d. Only if a statute is not clear on its face, ambiguous, or subject to unreasonable
interpretation should the statute be interpreted using elements outside the law itself. In
such a case, legislative history may guide the law’s appropriate interpretation. (Note:
If this is the case with the law you choose for class, you may “create” a legislative
history or conduct sufficient research to provide this information as the class exercise
unfolds.)
e. If the law’s meaning remains unclear, deference to expert government agencies’
reasonable interpretations may guide statutory construction.
f. If the law eludes interpretation based on the previous five canons, the law may be
unconstitutionally vague.
6. Hold a class debate over the constitutionality of presidential use of executive orders. One
side (conservative) argues restraint on the grounds that the Constitution delegates the power
to make laws to Congress and limits the president’s role to execute the laws. The other side
argues that execution of laws is a matter of interpretation and prioritization that necessarily
require deciding how and how much to execute that a president formally expresses in and
through executive orders. The president is independent of Congress and has no obligation to
follow its priorities.
7. Divide the class into two teams, one supporting the majority ruling in Citizens United, one
favoring the dissent. Have each group select three or four representative quotes about the rule
of law from the chapter’s excerpts of the case. Then hold a round table discussion of the