Northouse, Leadership 8e
SAGE Publications, 2019
Case 13.1: Choosing a Research Assistant
Case Synopsis and Analysis
Dr. Angi Dirks must select a summer research assistant. Four candidates were identified, and
Dr. Dirks seems to prefer Roberto and Michelle because they both have flexible schedules
over the summer. Roberto is an international student who receives high course evaluations, is
well liked and needs a job to help pay for school. Michelle is an exceptional graduate student
who plans to pursue a PhD, but does not seem to need the income from the summer work as
much as some of the other candidates. Carson receives excellent grades, is high achieving,
Learning objectives:
• Students should be able to evaluate an ethical issue in hiring by applying
utilitarianism, egoism, and deontology.
• Students should be able to apply concepts of distributive justice to a hiring
decision.
Answers to questions in the text:
1. Of the four options available to Angi, which is the most ethical?
This is a difficult question, perhaps best answered by applying different ethical
theories or lenses.
Ethical egoism states that a person should act so as to create the greatest good for
himself or herself. Using that theory, Angi should pick Roberto, Michelle, or Analisa.