CHAPTER 4: CULTURAL METAPHORS
The work of Kluckholn and Strodtbeck, Hall, Hofstede and many others who study
national cross-cultural differences has been invaluable in the area of cross-cultural studies. Their
dimensions of culture constitute a base upon which a majority of more recent studies have been
built. However, as discussed in Chapter 3, their work in some regards is incomplete. For
differences would be risky. It seems feasible to supplement the dimensional studies with another
approach. Along these lines, Gannon and his colleagues have argued that the dimensional
approach should be supplemented by a more content-rich or grounded approach, that of cultural
metaphors (see Gannon and Audia, 2000). A cultural metaphor is some unique or distinctive
institution, phenomenon or activity expressive of a nation’s values, such as the Chinese family
United States. (See Figures 4.1, 4.2, and 4.3.) In order to validate each metaphor, researchers
posed two overarching research questions. First, did the respondents from a particular country
identify with the items whose underlying factors were similar to those of the metaphors from
which they were generated? Second, could subjects distinguish between items describing their
culture from those describing another culture?
Taiwan. Two nations were compared in each instance: The United States and India; England
and Taiwan; and Germany and Italy. Thus there were three different questionnaires.
The results of this study were generally supportive of the metaphorical approach to
describing culture. Metaphors should, however, be used with caution. Metaphors do not pertain
to every individual or even every sub-group within a society. Rather, they highlight national