(Chapter 5) with institutional knowledge of the EU (Chapter 8) and of multilateral
institutions such as the WTO (Chapter 9). While the preceding case (Negotiating
Brexit) is taking a national policy perspective, this case brings the issues down to the
corporate level. The case can also be discussed to analyse the role of subsidiaries and
unit HQ within a multinational organization (Chapter 15) and the role of pan-
European supply chains and sourcing operations (Chapter 17).
3. The Integrative Case ‘McDonald’s Reinvents itself in India’ has been written to
discuss two fundamental challenges of foreign market entry: (1) how to adapt
products and processes to a local contexts, and (2) how to manage a partnership with a
local firm or entrepreneur. The case illustrates many good practices regarding
adaptation, perhaps surprising given McDonald’s image of a global brand. However,
it also highlights problems McDonald’s experienced in the relationship with one of its
local joint venture partners, a conflict that is still ongoing, and among other highlights
challenges of contract enforcement in a ‘weak’ institutional context. The case
discussion thus requires integrating learning from entry strategy (Chapters 11 and 12)
with operational strategy in logistics and marketing (Chapter 17).
4. The Integrative Case ‘Beko Washes Clothes Across Europe’ discusses the
international growth strategy of the Turkish washing machine brand Beko. It covers
initial entry strategies (Chapter 12), development of the brands and its distribution
channels (Chapter 17), mergers and acquisitions (Chapter 14) and eventually
coordination of dispersed units across Europe (Chapter 15).
5. Your company has developed a dominant global supply network that has contact with nearly
every country in the world. However, recent internal initiatives have encouraged managers to
reconfigure your company’s supply network to increase efficiency. As a part of this process,
you must use established logistics performance metrics to identify the country that has the
highest logistics competence on each continent (Africa, Asia, Europe, North America, and
South America). Prepare a report that indicates your recommendations and rationale for each
continent. What could explain the results of your analysis?
One resource which can be used is “Logistics Performance Index”. This website can be found
by entering the search term “logistics performance” at the globalEDGE™ Resource Desk
search box located at http://globaledge.msu.edu/resourceDesk/. Once at the Logistics
Performance Index website, click on Global LPI Ranking (you may need to scroll down a
little). At this point, you have the option to download the data in Excel format (button found
on right side of screen). There are 7 attributes which encompass the LPI. The attribute this
exercise focuses on is Logistics Competence. The 2007 report indicates the following
countries with the highest level on this attribute for each continent: South Africa (Africa),
Singapore (Asia), Netherlands (Europe), Canada (North America), and Chile (South
America). Students may come to many different conclusions based on the data available.
Search Term: “logistics performance”