20
From a Formal Perspective
Stars:
Movie stars are the easiest entry point into a discussion about what viewers notice in a scene and what
literally blends into the scenery. One way of introducing to the class some basic concepts of star theory is to ask
students whether stars “are just like us” or not. Bring a few supermarket tabloids to class to spur discussion and help
students distinguish between stars and celebrities. Ask the students to list what they know about Tom Cruise versus
Johnny Depp or Angelina Jolie versus Cate Blanchett. Why do they know personal information about these actors?
Does
it color how they experience these stars’ performances? Is there a difference between “Tom Cruise,” the public persona we
think we know, and Tom Cruise the actual person?
To illustrate the difference between stars, character actors, and character types, look at the sequence from the
2001 remake of Ocean’s Eleven in the hanger as the team of thieves convene. George Clooney and Brad Pitt are big
stars. Bernie Mac was a comedian turned character actor. Elliot Gould and Carl Reiner might appeal more to an
older viewer who remembers the 1960 original, which starred Rat Pack members Frank Sinatra and Sammy Davis
Jr. Casey Affleck, Don Cheadle, and Matt Damon are more interesting examples to consider. In 2001, Affleck and
Cheadle were not yet Oscar nominees. Damon had won an Academy Award for best original screenplay, but The
Bourne Identity, which transformed him into an internationally known action star, was not released until 2002.
For a more recent example of performative development than Antoine Doinel, discuss the principal actors’
evolution over the course of the Harry Potter movies. They got older, but did they get better? Are the actors able to
play other roles outside the series? Encourage the class to debate these questions, then screen a scene with Daniel
Radcliffe from 2007’s December Boys, or Emma Watson from 2013’s The Bling Ring, and see whether the students
accept these actors as their characters, or if they immediately feel like shouting, “It’s Harry!” or “It’s Hermione!”
Lighting:
Bring flashlights to class. Dim the lights and have different groups of students demonstrate different
lighting schemes.
From a Contextualized Perspective
Defining Our Place in a Film’s Material World:
Sets, props, actors, and lighting work together like the
ingredients of a meal. They may offer a viewer comfort food or an exotic new set of flavors. Some mise –en-scènes may
not be to a viewer’s taste or could benefit from more or less of an ingredient. Ask students to think of mise–en–
scènes that resonated (or didn’t resonate) with them. Why or why not? Encourage students to think critically about what
elements of the mise–en-scène do or do not work.
Interpretative Contexts for Mise–en-scène:
Discuss what prompts students to see a movie on a big screen vs. at home
on a laptop, or on an iPad. Some examples you might introduce are The Devil Wears Prada (2006), Harry Potter and
the Deathly Hallows: Part 1 (2010), and The Avengers (2012).
Teaching Technical Vocabulary and Key Concepts
An approach to evaluating comprehension could be to conduct cinematic “dictees” during class: students watch a film
clip, then describe it, either alone or in groups, using as many terms from the chapter as they can. Ask them to present their
“translations” to the rest of the class.
Many students find most of the concepts introduced in Chapter 2 easy to master. Instructors may want to spend extra
time on the different types of lighting and perhaps show clips from each of the films mentioned in that section. Do note that
the overlap between character actors and the particular character types with which they are associated can make the
distinction difficult to grasp. Discuss the actors who played minor roles in the film just screened and talk about what
attributes lead to them being cast in those parts. One helpful case study is J. Hoberman’s article “Peter Lorre —The Voice”
in Film Comment 41, no. 6 (2005).
TEACHING THE VIEWING CUES
Scenic Realism and Atmosphere, p. 103
Watch the clip from Life of Pi (2012) on LaunchPad for The Film Experience without sound. What is communicated
through the elements of the mise–en–scène alone?
This is an excellent opportunity for students to work collaboratively in small groups during class. It can also
provide the basis for a more extensive shot analysis assignment that incorporates the other topics covered in Part 2
of the text.
One way in may be to ask the class if anyone has ever seen a movie shot in a place he or she knows firsthand. What
was the same/different about the geography, facades, interiors featured in the film compared to those in real life? How
would their experience of a film like Life of Pi change if they had been to that location in real life? Why do the students
think the filmmakers chose the location and then modified it the way they did?