CHAPTER 6 Foreign Exchange Markets A-37
6. Section 6.2 defined the U.S. real exchange rate against the euro as the price of
American goods divided by the price of European goods. We measured both prices
in euros. Suppose we measured both prices in dollars instead of euros. Would this
change the definition of the real exchange rate? Explain.
ANSWER: Pmeasures the price of U.S. goods in dollars. The price of European
goods measured in dollars is given as (1/e)P*. Since edenotes the units of euros per
dollar, the inverse (1/e) measures the units of U.S. dollars needed to purchase one
7. For decades, one British pound has been worth more than one U.S. dollar. One
Japanese yen has been worth less than 0.01 U.S. dollar (1 cent). So a pound is more
than 100 times as valuable as a yen. Does this difference matter for the British and
Japanese economies? Explain.
ANSWER: The level of nominal exchange rates does not matter for economies. Nom-
inal exchange rates are a way to convert from one unit—for example, pounds—into
another unit—for example, dollars. Whether this conversion happens at a rate of 1:1
8. Suppose that, at a certain real exchange rate, a country’s net exports exceed its
net capital outflows. Is the equilibrium exchange rate higher or lower than this level?
Explain both in words and with a graph.
ANSWER: As in Figure 6.6, the real exchange rate ε* is the equilibrium exchange rate
9. Suppose country A sends most of its exports to country B. It gets most of its im-
ports from country C. If A’s currency appreciates against B’s currency and depreciates
against C’s, what happens to A’s imports, exports, and net exports?
ANSWER: If A’s currency appreciates against B’s currency and A sends most of its
exports to country B, then we expect country A’s exports to drop. If A’s currency de-