a. Compare the behavior of the interest rate under TR-S to its behavior under the
basic Taylor rule. (Hint: What might “S” stand for?)
ANSWER: The addition of S may stand for either a more stable or a smoothed in-
terest rate. The interest rates rwill change by less compared to r(–1) when the cen-
b. Is TR-S a realistic description of central banks’ behavior? Why might they fol-
low such a rule rather than the basic Taylor rule?
ANSWER: Given the risk of mismeasurement of the output gap and the neutral real
interest rate, the central bank may use the basic Taylor rule to determine what it
7. Suppose the Fed had a policy of responding to asset-price bubbles. Under this
policy, it would have set higher interest rates than it actually did during the stock mar-
ket boom of the late 1990s and the housing bubble of the 2000s.
a. For the period 1990–2007, draw a graph showing roughly what interest rates
the Fed would have chosen under the antibubble policy. Compare this hypothet-
ical interest-rate path to the actual path of rates (see Figure 15.2).
ANSWER: Except for the period in 2001, when the stock market boom had ended
b. How would the antibubble policy have changed the behavior of output and in-
flation? Draw rough graphs comparing the likely paths of these variables to the
paths they actually followed. (See pp. 379–380 for a summary of the actual
paths.) In this part of the question, assume the antibubble policy was unsuc-
cessful: stock and house prices rose rapidly despite higher interest rates.
ANSWER: In general, the higher interest rates should have reduced output below
the levels that were actually observed (with the exception of the period in 2001). Even
c. Now suppose the hypothetical policy succeeded: it dampened the stock mar-
ket and housing bubbles. How does this change the answer to part (b)?
ANSWER: The higher real interest rate and the relative decline in wealth because of
A-102 CHAPTER 15 Policies for Economic Stability