8. To successfully pursue a case for interference with contractual relations the plaintiff
must prove, in addition to other elements, that the defendant was aware of the existence
of the contract between the plaintiff and a third person. What are the policy reasons for
making this a necessary element?
The policy reasons for making this a necessary element are to motivate businesses to lure cus-
9. A name typed at the end of an offer or acceptance sent via e-mail is considered the equiv-
alent of a person’s signature. Why is this so?
❊Application Questions
1. In a telephone conversation with a sales representative of a linen company, the manager
of a hotel ordered $1,000 worth of sheets. Following the conversation he wrote a memo
to file documenting the agreement, initialed it, and sent a copy to the sales representa-
tive. A dispute arose between the parties and the linen company sued the hotel. Does
the parol-evidence rule bar the lawsuit? Why or why not?
No, the statute of frauds does not bar the lawsuit. Normally, to satisfy the statute of frauds,
the writing must contain the signature of the “party to be charged,” otherwise known as the
2. Laurie is planning a reception for her parents’ 50th wedding anniversary. She and her
parents keep kosher, which means they follow dietary laws prescribed by the Jewish re-
ligion. She decided to hold the anniversary party at the Westside Party House because
the manager, under pressure to increase sales, told Laurie the Party House serves kosher
food. Laurie later discovers that the Party House does not serve kosher food. If she
cancels her contract with the Party House and holds the party elsewhere, will she be li-
able to the Party House for breach of contract? Why or why not?
No, she will not be liable for breach of contract. A party to a contract can void it when the other
party utilized fraud. Here a Party House employee apparently intentionally misled Laurie into
3. A restaurant ordered 20 cases of champagne for New Year’s Eve. Delivery was due on
December 29, but the seller failed to deliver. As a result the restaurant was unable to of-
fer its New Year’s Eve patrons a midnight champagne toast. The hotel sued the seller
for breach of contract, claiming lost profits from the midnight toast and from future
parties the angry patrons would be discouraged from hosting at the restaurant. Discuss
the restaurant’s chances for success in this lawsuit.
Clearly, the seller breached the contract by failing to deliver the champagne. The restaurant had
a duty to mitigate its damages. It could have avoided the damages if it had purchased the cham-
40 ■Chapter 4
COPYRIGHT © 2008 by Thomson Delmar Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.