❊In most states, the liability applies only to a third party injured by the illegally served patron.
❊Most casinos offer their guests free drinks while they are gambling. The plaintiffs in several lawsuits
were given free drinks by a casino after becoming intoxicated. They then incurred significant
gambling debts owed to the casino. They sued the casino, claiming that the debt constituted dam-
ages resulting from illegal alcohol service and therefore they should be relieved from their debt.
❊The court rejected this argument and held for the casino.
❊For these reasons, the Dram Shop Act does not apply to a gambler who is served alcohol by a casino
after becoming visibly intoxicated and who continues to place bets and thereby incurs a gambling
debt. The bettor is not entitled to reimbursement of his loss from the casino.
H. Riverboat Casinos and the Jones Act
❊Many cities bordering on waterways have adopted riverboat casinos.
❊In some states, a riverboat located dockside but totally in a body of water can legally house gaming.
In other states, a boat must travel a certain distance off shore before it can validly permit gambling.
❊Litigation has resulted to determine which laws apply to riverboat casinos.
❊One issue that varies greatly depending on which law applies is the appropriate remedy when an
employee on a riverboat casino is injured while on duty.
❊The Jones Act.
■What constitutes a vessel has been the subject of several cases.
I. Casinos on Native American Reservations
❊In recent times, many casinos have been built on Native American reservations.
■Although the law of the state in which the reservation is located may outlaw gambling, that fact
does not preclude the reservation’s governing body from determining that gambling will be per-
mitted on the reservation.
❊Lawsuits against Native American tribes.
■One of IGRA’s goals was to balance the states’ interest in regulating high-stakes gambling within
their borders and the Native Americans’ resistance to state intrusions on their sovereignty.
❊Lawsuits against casino employees.
■Not infrequently, Native American tribes will transfer the management of casinos to a corporate
entity separate from the tribe. These entities are normally named as a defendant when a casino
patron is injured and sues. The question arises whether these entitities are entitled to immunity;
they customarily are.
■Dram Shop Act.
•Tribal immunity is not a bar to a lawsuit arising from the wrongful sale of alcohol at a Native
American casino.
•The reason is the state’s concern for the protection of the safety of its residents.
❊Indian Gaming Regulatory Act.
■The federal government has maintained some oversight of gaming conducted on reservations.
Its authority is embodied in the Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), which was adopted by
Congress in 1988.
■IGRA provides a comprehensive design for regulating gaming activities on Native American lands.
■The class most highly regulated is known as Class III and includes blackjack, craps and related
dice games, wheel games, roulette, electronic games of chance, slot machines, card games in
which the players play against the house, and keno.
■Where a tribe has undertaken gaming operations without satisfying these prerequisites, the fed-
eral government is authorized to obtain search warrants and seize slot machines and related gam-
bling devices and paraphernalia from the tribe’s casinos.
■The managers and operators of a Native American casino operating illegally are subject to federal
prosecution for the violation.
■Additionally, the United States government can seek injunctive relief against the casino to
prevent it from operating.
Specialized Destinations: Casinos, Theme Parks, and Spas ■191
COPYRIGHT © 2008 by Thomson Delmar Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
51934_16_Ch16_p187-201.qxd 7/6/07 10:41 PM Page 191