Travel Agents and Airlines—Rights and Liabilities ■145
■Foreign citizenship alone cannot constitute notice of a driver’s incompetence.
■Renting to a person under age 25, without more concerns, does not constitute negligent entrust-
ment, nor does negligent entrustment apply where a car-rental company had intended but failed
to place the renter on a “Do Not Rent” list.
❊Rental of a car known to be defective.
❊Unauthorized drivers.
■A problem that car-rental companies often confront is the use of the rented vehicle by unautho-
rized drivers.
■Authorized operators include the lessee and anyone else the rental company approves in writing.
Everyone else is an unauthorized driver.
■If a traveler rents a car and allows a friend to drive who has not been approved by the rental com-
pany, the friend is an unauthorized driver.
■If the friend is in an accident with the car, the rental company will not be liable for resulting
injuries and the rental company’s insurance will not cover the collision. The traveler who rented
the car will be liable to the rental company for damage to the car.
■Travelers who rent cars can avoid these problems by ensuring the rental cars are driven only by
authorized drivers.
■A valet is not an authorized driver even though he parks a rental car with the permission of the
authorized driver.
❊Age discrimination with car rentals.
■The law in some states upholds the right of a rental company to refuse to rent to people under
age 25.
■The law in other states prevents car-rental companies from refusing to rent a car to someone who
is at least 18 years of age, provided insurance coverage is available.
■Most such states provide that any additional insurance costs imposed because of the age of the
driver can be passed on to the driver.
L. Answers to Case Example Questions
13-8-1. Why do you think the law relieves an airline from liability for breach of contract when
a flight is canceled due to weather conditions?
While it is true in a cancellation situation that the airline is not performing its contractual
duty to provide air transportation at a specified time, the airline’s concern is not just
13-9-1. Why does a pilot need the authority to remove passengers from a flight?
The pilot is charged with the safety of the passengers and crew aboard the aircraft. Often the
13-10-1. Why do you think the pilot was entitled to rely on statements from the crew “without
further inquiry”?
The pilot was entitled to rely on statements from the crew without further inquiry because
13-11-1. What should the airline have done in this case to minimize the loss to the plaintiff?
The airline should have made arrangements for the plaintiff on another airline to make it to
COPYRIGHT © 2008 by Thomson Delmar Learning. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED.
51934_13_Ch13_p136-150.qxd 7/6/07 10:39 PM Page 145