CASE 209
Enron: Questionable Not Accounting for the
FutureLeads to Collapse
CASE NOTES FOR INSTRUCTORS
The purpose of this case is to show how it is possible for a well-known and respected company to become
swept up in unethical and illegal business practices, which can result in damage to thousands of
employees, investors, and other stakeholders. Although this case is complex and involves many actors,
one important point that emerges is how a number of individuals, including attorneys, auditors,
executives, and employees, apparently worked together to achieve Enron’s objectives, even though these
objectives were unethical and often not in the best interests of stakeholders.
The Enron case did not end with the collapse of the company. In addition to the complex ethical issues
involved in Enron’s collapse, the company, its partners, and its employees have been caught in several
ongoing legal struggles. In 2004 Enron’s new board of directors sued 11 financial institutions for helping
Lay, Fastow, Skilling, and others to hide Enron’s true financial condition. The proceedings were dubbed
the “megaclaims litigation.” Among the defendants were Royal Bank of Scotland, Deutsche Bank, and
Citigroup. Enron sold its last business, Prisma Energy, in 2006. In early 2007, it changed its name to
Enron Creditors Recovery Corporation. The sole goal of the newly-named organization was to pay off
Enron’s remaining creditors and wrap up Enron’s affairs. By 2008 Enron had settled with all involved
institutions, with Citigroup being the last. Enron was able to obtain nearly $20 million to distribute to its
creditors as a result of the megaclaims litigation.
Since the collapse of Enron, many executives who worked for the company or had business dealings with
it have been swept up in the investigations and prosecutions of the former energy giant. Many of the
people convicted of crimes connected to Enron have already served their sentences, but Jeff Skilling
remains in prison after being convicted of honest services fraud. Former CFO Andy Fastow was released
from prison and now gives lectures on business ethics in different forums. A reduction in former CEO
Jeffrey Skilling’s sentence allowed for his release in 2017. However, in June 2010 the United States
Supreme Court ruled that Skilling should not have been tried under the honest services law because it was
intended for bribes and kickbacks, not for conduct that is ambiguous or vague. However, the court’s
decision did not overturn Skilling’s conviction, but sent the case back to a lower court for evaluation. To
this day, Jeffrey Skilling continues to maintain his innocence. and appeal his case. In April of 2012, the
Supreme Court denied his appeal, claiming any errors made in the trial were negligible. However, the
following year a federal judge reduced Skilling’s sentence to 14 years.
Although this case may not seem so shocking now in the wake of Bernard Madoff and the failure of so
many of Wall Street’s most venerable firms, students should keep in mind that at that time this case sent
shock waves around the world. Instructors may wish to have students compare aspects of this Enron case
with other cases provided in this book, such as the Galleon Group and Wells Fargoand frauds of the
century. These cases share elements, such as the type of misconduct and pervasiveness of unethical
behavior in the companies’ corporate cultures. The Enron case now stands as a precursor for business
misconduct that dominated the early 21st century, and it remains a valuable case.
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly
accessible website, in whole or in part.