CASE 17
Fraud in Dixon, Illinois: All the Queen’s Horses
Could Not Save Her
CASE NOTES FOR INSTRUCTORS
This case is a good example of the need for financial controls. Rita Crundwell was the treasurer of the
small city of Dixon, Illinois. Everyone trusted her with the city’s finances. In addition to her role as
treasurer, she also raised champion quarter horses and had won 52 horse championships. In 2011 while
she was out of the office, a city clerk took over Rita’s job and came across a strange-looking bank account
in the city’s name. Money from the account was being used to purchase lavish items such as jewelry and
boats. The suspicious account was reported to the mayor and the FBI. After taking five months to build
their case, the FBI arrested Rita Crundwell for municipal fraud on April 17, 2012. Rita was found guilty
of stealing over $53 million from the city of Dixon over two decades.
The most notable aspect of this case is how easy it would have been to detect the fraud if proper controls
had been in place. For instance, there was Rita’s lavish lifestyle. Her lifestyle was unaffordable for
someone with her salary, even with her prize winnings from her horse championships. On Rita’s tax
returns, there were no documents to explain how she was making so much money—a fact that the
accounting firm, Clifton Gunderson, should have questioned. Clifton Gunderson was the accountant for
both Dixon and Rita, indicating a possible conflict of interest. Rita provided fraudulent invoices for phony
city projects that did not look legitimate. There were no numbers for a contact person on the invoices, and
one invoice even had a non-existent date. It should also have been relatively simple to check on whether
these projects were actually taking place.
Fifth Third Bank and the city of Dixon also share part of the blame for the fraud. When Rita first opened
the fraudulent account, Fifth Third Bank allowed it without a resolution or by requiring anybody else to
sign off on it. Bank statements revealed that money funneled from city funds were being spent on things
that had nothing to do with city projects, such as jewelry. Checks were deposited under Rita’s name rather
than “City of Dixon.” The city was partially at fault as well because it allowed Rita to have sole
responsibility for finances without providing controls to prevent fraud. Additionally, while many residents
questioned Rita’s lavish lifestyle, nobody spoke up.
Students should realize that a massive fraud does not always have to involve an elaborate, hard-to-detect
scheme. In fact, many instances of fraud would have been highly obvious and detectable if the right
questions were asked and suspicions were investigated. This case should show the importance of
questioning suspicious activity and adopting controls to ensure financial gatekeepers are held accountable
for the money under their charge.
QUESTIONS AND 0DISCUSSION
1. What were some of the red flags that fraud was occurring?
© 2019 Cengage Learning. All rights reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license
distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.