5
Chapter 9: Growing and Internationalizing the Entrepreneurial Firm
Closing Case Discussion Guide
Boom in Busts: Good or Bad?
Corporate bankruptcies have climbed to new heights since the Great Recession of 2008 -2009.
Firms ranging from mighty ones such as Lehman Brothers and General Motors to tiny
entrepreneurial outfits have dropped out left and right around the world. Efforts trying to rescue
failing firms from bankruptcies stem from an “anti-failure” bias widely shared among
entrepreneurs, scholars, journalists, and government officials. Recently, many governments have
realized that entrepreneur-friendly bankruptcy laws can not only lower exit barriers, but also
lower entry barriers for entrepreneurs.
From an institution-based standpoint, if entrepreneurship is to be encouraged, there is a need to
ease the pain associated with bankruptcy by means such as allowing entrepreneurs to walk away
from debt, a legal right that bankrupt U.S. entrepreneurs appreciate. At a societal level, if many
would-be entrepreneurs, in fear of failure, abandon their ideas, there will not be a thriving
entrepreneurial sector.
One side of the debate asserts that at a societal level, entrepreneurial failures may be beneficial,
since it is through a large number of entrepreneurial experimentations—although many will fail
—that winning solutions will emerge and that economies will develop. Thus, the boom in busts
is not necessarily bad. Critics argue that people with lots of money such as Trump can easily
avoid the consequences of big losses by cashing out at the first sign of trouble, because
bankruptcy laws protect them.
Video Case
Watch “The Essence of the Entrepreneur” by Lord Kalms of Dixons Group.
1. To most people, it seems that a successful entrepreneur would be satisfied. However, Lord
Kalms claims that a successful entrepreneur needs to be continually dissatisfied. Explain
how his claim makes sense.