International Corporate Governance and Control 7
Solution to Supplemental Case: Redwing Technology Company
a. The earnings performance translated in dollars is misleading because they are distorted by varying
exchange rates. The actual earnings in each local currency in each subsidiary should be assessed,
since the subsidiary has no control over the exchange rate used for translation. The translation causes
earnings to be overstated when the local currency is strong (against the dollar) and understated when
the local currency is weak. The following table shows the earnings of each subsidiary when
measured in the local currency. Based on this table, the Canadian subsidiary experienced a consistent
growth in earnings over time, averaging about a 14 percent increase per year. Conversely, the South
African subsidiary experienced consistent declines in earnings over time, with an average annual
earnings growth rate of –4.38%. The Japanese subsidiary experienced a decline in earnings in all but
one year, and its average annual earnings growth rate was –1.03%. When measured in this way, the
executive in charge of the Canadian subsidiary appears to have achieved the best perfor mance. The
results are much different when earnings are measured in U.S. dollars for all subsidiaries. The
Canadian performance would not be as high while the South African and Japanese performance
would be higher. Yet, the chief executives of the respective subsidiaries cannot control the translated
exchange rate. It can be argued that they should not be rewarded or penalized because of the
translation effect caused by a volatile exchange rate (although there could be exceptions when they
are personally responsible for hedging any remitted earnings or any inflows of funds coming from
other countries).
Earnings (in millions) Denominated in the Local Currency
Annual Annual Annual
Years Percentage South Percentage Percentage
Ago Canada Increase Africa Increase Japan Increase
5 C$16.80 — R210.00 — Y7,500.00 —
4 19.92 18.57% 200.00 –4.76% 7,441.86 –.77%
3 22.68 13.85 187.50 –6.25 7,608.69 2.24
2 25.92 14.28 180.00 –3.74 7,454.54–2.03
1 28.44 9.72 175.00 –2.78 7,187.50–3.58
b. Based on its high annual growth rate of earnings, the Canadian subsidiary would likely deserve a cash
infusion from the parent to push for additional growth. The parent would probably feel that its funds
are more likely to generate decent returns there than in other countries.
c. Even if the earnings are remitted, Canada would still be the best bet. There was an assumption that
last year’s exchange rate would be a reasonable guess for exchange rates in future years for each
currency. This means that the parent will invest funds at the same exchange rate as the rate in which
subsidiary earnings will be converted back to dollars in the future, for each subsidiary. Thus, no
subsidiary is expected to have an exchange rate advantage over the others.
d. The earnings of the Canadian and South African subsidiaries only appear to be highly correlated
when translated in U.S. dollars. Their earnings in local currencies were not highly correlated. Thus,
some diversification benefits would be lost if the Canadian subsidiary was sold (not to mention that it
is the best-performing subsidiary) or if the South African subsidiary was sold.
© 2018 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, in whole or in part, except for use as
permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password-protected website for classroom use.