One company that is successfully capitalizing on the communication power of its annual
report is Aflac Incorporated. A Fortune 500 company, Aflac insures more than 40 million people
worldwide and is the largest life insurer in Japan. It has made its marketing fame as a leading
underwriter of supplemental insurance. While the Aflac duck catapulted the company’s brand
recognition from 12 percent to nearly 90 percent following its introduction in 2000, research has
shown that consumers want to learn more about the company’s products and services.
The annual report is an important tool Aflac is using to convey its positive message.
Aflac’s annual reports have been honorably recognized every year since the inception of Chief
Executive magazines’ rating system of the best annual reports. Aflac’s reports have consistently
been assigned “World-Class” status by scoring at least 100 of a potential 135 points on the
evaluation system. Commenting on the outstanding recognition, Aflac’s CEO Dan Amos said:
“We are extremely pleased to see Aflac’s annual report at the top of the list of the best annual
reports. Our shareholders are our most valuable customers, and we believe that effective
communication with our customers is crucial to the success of our business.”
The annual report rating is based on a 135-point copyrighted evaluation system that
factors in elements ranging from extensive CEO involvement to more financial disclosure than is
required by the Securities and Exchange Commission. According to Sid Cato, contributing editor
and judge for Chief Executive’s annual report listing, Aflac’s exemplary reports include
multiple-year financial data, biographical information on company officers, and fully captioned
graphs, all of which helped place it as one of the best.
Careful design and organization of Aflac’s annual report have led to positive public
recognition and likely improved the company’s competitive edge. In speaking of the annual
report, Sid Cato says, “This is the No. 1 document a company can produce. It’s the key corporate
communiqué. It indicates how the company feels about itself.” As contributing editor and the
judge for Chief Executive magazine’s annual report listing, Sid Cato is recognized by many as the
world’s foremost authority on annual reports. The annual listing, which has appeared in the
magazine’s November issue for over 20 years, is based on evaluations of reports submitted from
around the world, according to a 135-point copyrighted evaluation system.
Important factors that Cato looks for in effective annual reports include clear financial
disclosures, biographical data on corporate officers and board members, a brief and
forward-looking letter from the company’s chair, and design continuity that suggests the
company’s accountants work well with its communication people. The use of understandable
language with average sentence length of 16 words or less is important and four-color artwork
and photos are also valued. These design factors helped propel Aflac to the top of the numeric
scoring. Cato says, “If a company doesn’t know enough to produce an annual report that says
‘Open me, read me,’ you should toss it in the wastebasket.”
In addition to his annual report rating, Cato authors a monthly newsletter on annual
reports and provides report critiques at the request of companies that include tips for
improvement. While encouraging companies to develop a clear theme and to use their reports to
document their competitive advantages, Cato recognizes that the companies often fear revealing
so much that they erode their competitive edge. Instead of attempting to satisfy so many different
audiences with one annual report, some companies are spending time and energy breaking
information into component parts. Digital media such as the Internet and CD-ROMs have the
facility to present large amounts of information in different ways.
Cato feels that the worst thing that can happen in an annual report is for management not
to explain the numbers. According to Cato, a glossary of terms should be included, and every
graph should be fully captioned. He cautions readers of annual reports: If you see something in
the financial data that raises questions, such as an operating loss, and it’s not explained anywhere
in the report, that should raise suspicion.
Sources: Aflac takes next step in defining brand: Brand evolution of AFLAC. (2004, December 2). PR Newswire US.
Retrieved March 27, 2006, from LexisNexis database; Aflac’s annual report ranked first in Chief Executive magazine’s
© 2015 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a
publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
16