360
relationship between the ‘townies’ and the college students.” (Realize that even as you decide
how to frame the question of any topic, you’re suggesting parameters for your story.)
2. Identify the information you’ll need to write the story from conventional- and public-
journalism perspectives. First, start with the conventional-news approach. Where do you go
for information? Do you think you already “know” what these sources would say? Does your
approach mean that there are some people you will or will not consider as sources? Because
you are a member of the campus/community in which this problem exists, what do you know
about the problem? Can you include your knowledge in the story? If so, how? Does the
information change if it is a broadcast story (television or radio) instead of a print story?
Address these questions using a public-journalism approach.
3. How will you organize the two stories? Does all the information fit into a two-sided story
framework? How many “sides” might there actually be to this problem?
4. Analyze the ways in which each approach framed the story. What story details did you
select? Which were emphasized the most? Which story details were excluded? Why? What
do the stories seem to suggest as the cause of the problem? What solutions, if any, do the
stories advance?
5. Evaluate each story approach. Which is more deliberative? Which is easier to write? Which
is more interesting to write? Which story do you think would be most interesting to readers?
What do you think was the ultimate goal of each story approach?
Options: This exercise could also be adapted as an individual or group paper assignment. You
might consider having advanced students actually report and write stories from both
perspectives.
ANALYZING THE QUALITY OF NEWS