Chapter 3/Interdependence and the Gains from Trade ❖ 39
a. For Ruby, it takes ten minutes to produce one ounce of potatoes. Those same
ten minutes could be used to produce one-half ounce of meat. Thus, the
opportunity cost of producing an ounce of potatoes is one-half ounce of meat.
b. For Frank, it takes 15 minutes to produce one ounce of potatoes. Those same
15 minutes could be used to produce one-fourth ounce of meat. Therefore,
the opportunity cost of producing one ounce of potatoes is one-fourth ounce
of meat.
c. The opportunity cost of producing one ounce of meat is the inverse of the
opportunity cost of producing one ounce of potatoes.
Your students may have a hard time comprehending this. Make sure that
you go through these calculations several times and write out every step.
2. Denition of comparative advantage: the ability to produce a good at a
lower opportunity cost than another producer.
a. Frank has a lower opportunity cost of producing potatoes and therefore has a
comparative advantage in the production of potatoes.
b. Ruby has a lower opportunity cost of producing meat and therefore has a
comparative advantage in the production of meat.
3. Because the opportunity cost of producing one good is the inverse of the
opportunity cost of producing the other, it is impossible for a person to have a
comparative advantage in the production of both goods.
C. Comparative Advantage and Trade
1. When specialization in a good occurs (assuming there is a comparative
advantage), total output will grow.
© 2018 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website,
in whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed with a certain product or service or otherwise
on a password-protected website or school-approved learning management system for classroom use.