In this example, the firm is currently projected to run at large unfunded losses and the
plan is not a feasible financial plan. One point of this exercise is to show that the
operations. While many finance academics and practitioners are content with using
accounting-friendly versions that incorporate a tax credit and a deferred tax asset
investment. As the cash flows are identical, it is not surprising that the valuations are the
same.
Revenue 12,500 16,000 Year 0 Year 1 Year 2
-Non–Interest Expenses -125,000 –125,000 NI 0 –78,750 -76,300
EBIT –112,500 –109,000 +Dep 0 5,000 4,500
-Interest 0 0 -dDTA 0 –33,750 -32,700
EBT -112,500 –109,000 –Capex -50,000 0 0
-Tax Credit 33,750 32,700 –dNWC 0 -1,950 0
Net Income -78,750 -76,300 +Principal Proc. 0 0 0
Equity VCF -50,000 -109,450 -104,500
Depreciation 5,000 4,500 Terminal Flow 2,500,000
Total Flow -50,000 -109,450 2,395,500
Balance Sheets Startup Year 1 Year 2 NPV 1,283,263
Assets
Required Cash 0 3,000 3,000 Valuation (DDA) (Surplus Cash Situation Affects Terminal Flow)
Surplus Cash 0 -109,450 –213,950 Year 0 Year 1 Year 2
Deferred Tax Asset 0 33,750 66,450 NI 0 -78,750 -76,300
Gross Fixed Assets 50,000 50,000 50,000
Accumulated Depreciation 0 -5,000 -9,500 +Dep 0 5,000 4,500
Net Fixed Assets 50,000 45,000 40,500 -dDTA 0 –33,750 -32,700
Total Assets 50,000 -27,700 -104,000 -Capex -50,000 0 0
Liabilities and Equity -dNWC 0 107,500 104,500
Accounts Payable 750 750 +Principal Proc. 0 0 0
Accrued Expenses 300 300 Equity VCF –50,000 0 0
Debt 0 0 0 Terminal Flow 2,286,050
Equity 50,000 -28,750 -105,050 Total Flow -50,000 0 2,286,050
Total L+E 50,000 -27,700 -104,000
NPV 1,302,692
Accounting Cash Flows Year 0 Year 1 Year 2 Sum
NI 0 -78,750 –76,300 0
+Depr 0 5,000 4,500 Difference in EqCF 0 109,450 -109,450
-dDTA 0 -33,750 –32,700 NPV of Difference 19,429
-dAR 0 0 0 DDA Value Decline 19,429 (=1,302,692-1,283,263)
-dInv 0 0 0 due to timing differences on surplus cash
+dAP 0 750 0
+dAccrd 0 300 0
-Capex -2,500 0 0