© 2016 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be copied, scanned, or duplicated, i n whole or in part, except for use as permitted in a license distributed
with a certain product or service or otherwise on a password–protected website for classroom use.
3. Because of the intangibility of services, customers rely more heavily on price as an indicator
of quality.
a. If customers perceive the services in a category as being similar in quality, and if the
quality of the services is difficult to judge even after purchase, customers may seek the
lowest-priced provider.
b. If quality varies, customers may rely on the price-quality association.
4. Under certain conditions, such as when the service is perceived as generic in nature,
marketers may be limited with respect to setting prices.
a. Market conditions may limit prices for certain services.
1. Service quality is difficult to evaluate because services have few search qualities—tangible
attributes that can be evaluated before the purchase (such as color, style, size, feel, or fit).
2. Service quality must instead be judged on experience and credence qualities.
a. Experience qualities are attributes that can be judged only during purchase or
consumption of a service.
b. Credence qualities are attributes consumers are unable to evaluate even after purchasing
and consuming a service because of lack of knowledge or skill.
c. Evaluation of a good is much easier because all goods possess search qualities, tangible
attributes such as color, style, size, feel, or fit that can be evaluated prior to purchase.
3. In spite of the difficulties in evaluating quality, service quality may be the only way that
customers can choose one service over another.
4. Marketers must learn how customers evaluate service quality (see Table 13.2).
a. Tangible elements, such as the appearance of facilities and employees, are often the only
aspects of a service which can be viewed before purchase and consumption.