MINI CASE
Lewis Securities Inc. has decided to acquire a new market data and quotation system for its
Richmond home office. The system receives current market prices and other information
from several on-line data services, then either displays the information on a screen or stores
it for later retrieval by the firm’s brokers. The system also permits customers to call up
current quotes on terminals in the lobby.
The equipment costs $1,000,000, and, if it were purchased, Lewis could obtain a term
loan for the full purchase price at a 10 percent interest rate. Although the equipment has a
six-year useful life, it is classified as a special-purpose computer, so it falls into the MACRS
3-year class. If the system were purchased, a 4-year maintenance contract could be
obtained at a cost of $20,000 per year, payable at the beginning of each year. The equipment
would be sold after 4 years, and the best estimate of its residual value at that time is
$200,000. However, since real-time display system technology is changing rapidly, the
actual residual value is uncertain.
As an alternative to the borrow-and-buy plan, the equipment manufacturer informed
Lewis that Consolidated Leasing would be willing to write a 4-year guideline lease on the
equipment, including maintenance, for payments of $260,000 at the beginning of each year.
Lewis’s marginal federal-plus-state tax rate is 40 percent. You have been asked to analyze
the lease-versus-purchase decision, and in the process to answer the following questions:
a. 1. Who are the two parties to a lease transaction?
Answer: The two parties are the lessee, who uses the asset, and the lessor, who owns the asset.
Mini Case: 19 – 1
© 2017 Cengage Learning. All Rights Reserved. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible
website, in whole or in part.