Part 3 ♦ Product Decisions 19
Part 3 – Integrated Case Assignments
MARKETING MISCUES
McAfee Virus Protection Update Crashes Computers Worldwide
Headquartered in Santa Clara, California, McAfee was founded in the late 1980s and is now one of the world’s
largest dedicated security providers. McAfee’s customers range from individual home users to large corporations to
governments around the world. The company segments its markets into home, small business, mid-sized business,
and enterprise. Annual revenue has grown to around $2 billion. The business market is about 60 percent of the
company’s revenue, with the remainder from the consumer marketplace. Geographically, approximately 60 percent
of revenue is derived from the North American marketplace. McAfee’s online subscription site,
http://home.mcafee.com, provides online software delivery to over two million paid subscribers, making the site one
of the largest paid subscription sites on the Internet.
The Botched Update
While the online software delivery has been a hallmark of McAfee’s product design and delivery, it was almost the
downfall of the company in early 2010. At that time, a faulty anti-virus update file caused havoc for McAfee
customers as computers worldwide were shut down by the update file. Essentially, the anti-virus update
misclassified a fundamental Windows XP system file as a malicious program. As such, McAfee’s anti-virus
program was instructed to detect and delete the threat. Unfortunately, since this was an essential Windows XP
program, computers were rendered useless as many experienced the dreaded “blue screen of death.”
The extent of the impact upon McAfee’s customer base was never clearly disclosed. Media reports and Twitter
postings suggested that the affected users numbered in the thousands, while the company suggested that the affected
group was less than half of a percent of the company’s customers. While the actual number of affected home and
business customers might never be known, there were notable shutdowns that were brought to the public’s attention.
For example, it was reported that a third of the hospitals in Rhode Island had to suspend treatment to non-trauma
emergency room patients and state police patrol car computers in Kentucky were shut down. One large U.S.
multinational company reported that 50,000 personal computers could only be repaired manually by a technician
sitting at each computer.
The Aftermath
Although the faulty update product was removed from all McAfee download servers within hours after it was
discovered, it took almost 36 hours for McAfee to render an apology to its customers. McAfee’s executive vice
president of technical support posted an apology on McAfee’s blog site. McAfee customers were not necessarily
appeased by the apology, as they felt that it took too long for the company to render its apology and that it
downplayed the number of affected customers. Importantly, however, the aftermath of the faulty product focused on
the poor levels of quality assurance at McAfee.
According to some reports, McAfee followed shoddy quality assurance procedures that enabled the release of
the faulty product. Critically, the faulty product had not been tested on the version of Windows XP for which the
product ultimately crashed. With Windows XP in use by a large number of computer users, many questioned why
this configuration was left out of the testing processing. Apparently McAfee had recently changed its quality
assurance process. In doing so, it allowed the faulty file to get past the test environment and onto the computers of
its customers.
While the company did offer to reimburse home and home office customers for expenses incurred to fix the
computer problem and/or to extend antivirus subscriptions for two years free of charge, customers were not easily
appeased. The reputation of software security providers such as McAfee hinge on their ability to prevent problems,
not cause them. Thus, the lack of confidence in McAfee was exemplified by home customers who disparaged the
company’s quality control with blog comments such as, “If this release of McAfee’s passed their quality control, it
seems to me they have no quality control” and “What a spectacular failure of QC.” One software consultant noted
that 75 percent of the company’s clients had been switched away from McAfee prior to the disaster. The company
was thankful it had done that since their technicians were in a chaotic frenzy running all over town, billing their
clients for a software glitch in a product that the consulting company had recommended to the client to start with. To
sum up the concerns, one customer noted that as a security protection product offering, McAfee should not be on the
list of risky software downloads!