viii Teaching Human Relations: Principles, Methods, and the Skills Approach
SELECTING THE APPROPRIATE TEACHING METHOD
Human relations training and development lends itself to a wide variety of teaching methods. As you
assess the material to be covered in each chapter, you can choose the most appropriate way to present
the information. This section reviews several teaching methods that will assist you in helping your
students develop skills, reshape their attitudes, and understand basic concepts of human behavior. These
methods include small-group discussion, role playing, videoing, field interviews, lectures, guest
speakers, and the use of audiovisual materials.
Small-Group Discussion Methods
On some occasions, you will want to tap the knowledge and experience of class members. Other times,
you may want to encourage constructive, creative thinking about a specific topic or problem area. The
four group discussion methods presented here will help you enhance the teaching/learning process by
involving your students in a variety of ways.
1. Dyad. Class members are divided into small groups of two persons each. When discussing a
problem or an issue, one member of the dyad may take the “pro” side while the other person takes
the “con” side.
Advantages. Every class member is actively involved in the teaching/learning process (no one can
be a passive onlooker). Participants who are more reluctant to express their views in class will feel
more comfortable in a small-group setting. Both sides of an issue can be discussed freely.
2. Small Group. Class members are divided into small groups of three or four persons. The groups
meet simultaneously to discuss a topic or perform a task assigned to them.
Advantages. A group consisting of several members may produce more solutions, or better
solutions, to a problem than the dyad might. Also, people who do not feel comfortable speaking in
a large group are more likely to contribute their ideas and suggestions in a smaller group.
3. Fish Bowl. The members of one small group (five to eight people) meet in a circle or cluster and
are observed by the members of a second group of the same size who sit around them in a larger
circle. The inner group discusses an issue or works on a problem supplied by the instructor.
Usually ten to fifteen minutes are allotted for discussion. The outer group members do not
participate but observe the inner group closely. At the end of the discussion time, the two groups
change places. The new inner group comments on ideas expressed by the first group and adds its
own ideas or observations. As before, the outer group can only observe.
Advantages. A more in-depth analysis of an issue or problem will usually emerge, and students
will have an opportunity to express a wide variety of views. People in the outer circle are in a
good position to give feedback to inner-circle members about their participation, whether they
hindered or helped the group, how supportive they were, and so on.
4. Debate. The class is divided into two teams and is given a topic to debate. One team takes the
affirmative side and the other team takes the opposing view. A fifteen– to twenty-minute
preparation period is provided before the debate begins. Each team elects a captain and a “second”
to the captain. When the debate begins, the captain is given five minutes to present his or her
team’s position, and the “second” is given three minutes. The opposing team’s captain and
“second” are given equal time to present their team’s arguments. After the formal presentations
are made, other team members may join in the debate. The instructor serves as moderator.
Advantages. Everyone takes a stand on the issue, so students develop a strong interest in the
subject. Both sides of the issue are thoroughly aired.