978-1305575080 Chapter 16 Solution Manual

subject Type Homework Help
subject Pages 9
subject Words 6079
subject Authors David P. Twomey, Marianne M. Jennings, Stephanie M Greene

Unlock document.

This document is partially blurred.
Unlock all pages and 1 million more documents.
Get Access
page-pf1
Chapter 16
WRITING, ELECTRONIC FORMS, AND INTERPRETATION OF
CONTRACTS
RESTATEMENT
Some contracts must be in writing to be enforceable. These contracts include contracts that cannot be performed
within one year, contracts for the sale or mortgage of real property, agreements to pay the debt of another,
contracts to marry and contracts for the sale of goods costing $500 or more.
If a contract is required to be in writing, the writing may be a formal contract, but it may also consist of notes,
memos, faxes, letters, or electronic transmissions. Oral contracts that are required to be in writing are
unenforceable, but the courts do recognize certain exceptions such as part performance and reliance.
The parol evidence rule prohibits the use of oral evidence to contradict the terms of a complete, final and
unambiguous contract. The rule is used to prevent parties from denying the existence of a contract or the finality
of its terms. There are some exceptions to the parol evidence rule such as modification of a contract, illegality
and misrepresentation.
Once a contract is reduced to its written form, the interpretation of that contract is important in determining the
parties’ performance and rights. A jury plays a key role in judging the intent of the parties from the words chosen
and the references incorporated. Other rules for interpretation include looking at the whole contract to determine
overall intent or isolating one clause so that the contract is preserved despite an ambiguity in one portion.
Issues in interpretation include the meaning and satisfaction of condition as well as the meaning of contradictory
or ambiguous terms. In interpretation of contracts, courts may also imply terms from industry practice, custom,
statutes, standards of fairness or in order to avoid hardship.
STUDENT LEARNING OUTCOMES
LO.1: Explain when a contract must be evidenced by a writing.
LO.2: Explain the effect of noncompliance with the statute of frauds.
LO.3: Explain the parol evidence rule and the exceptions to this rule.
LO.4: Understand the basic rule of contract construction that a contract is enforced according to its terms.
LO.5: State the rules for interpreting ambiguous terms in a contract.
INSTRUCTOR’S INSIGHTS
Break the chapter down into three components – related Learning Outcomes are indicated in ( ):
1. What is the statute of frauds and what is its impact on the enforceability of contracts?
Discuss when oral contracts are valid
2. What is the parol evidence rule and what does it do?
Present the nature of the parol evidence rule (LO.3)
3. What are the rules of construction and interpretation of contracts?
Explain the role of the intention of the parties in interpretation of contracts (LO.4)
Present the rules for dealing with contradictory, ambiguous and implied terms (LO.5)
page-pf2
CHAPTER OUTLINE
I. What is the Statute of Frauds and What is its Impact on the Enforceability of Contracts?
A. Validity of oral contracts
1. The failure to have a writing does not mean there is no contract
B. Contracts that must be evidenced by a writing (See Figure 16-1 in text)
1. Agreement that cannot be performed within one year after the contract is made
a. The statute of frauds does not apply if it is possible under the terms of the agreement to
perform the contract within one year
CASE BRIEF: Bithoney v. Fulton-DeKalb Hospital
721 S.E. 2d 577 (Ga. App. 2011)
FACTS: Dr. Bithony filed suit against the hospital’s governing board after he accepted an oral
employment offer from the hospital, but the night before he was to begin work, the board did not
approve his hiring. He sued for breach of an oral contract for severance of 15 month’s salary. A
draft employment contract contained a severance provision for “full severance payment” which
would be “for 15 months from the effective date of said termination”.
ISSUE: Was the oral severance agreement barred by the statute of frauds?
REASONING: Contracts that cannot be performed within one year must be in writing. Because the draft
employment agreement provided the severance “shall be payable for 15 months”, it was found
to be a 15-month payment term barred by the statute of frauds.
2. Agreement to sell or a sale of any interest in real property
a. Mortgages
3. Promise to answer for the debt or default of another (guarantor)
a. Main purpose issue
CASE BRIEF: MPI v. Jorge Lopez Ventura
102 S.W.2d 252 (Tex. App. 2003)
FACTS: Joel Burgower owned Material Partnerships, Inc. (MPI), which supplied Sacos
Tubulares del Centro, S.A. de C.V. (Sacos), a Mexican bag manufacturer, with essential
materials to make its products. When MPI was not paid for shipments, MPI insisted that Jorge
Lopez, Sacos’s general manager, personally guarantee all past and future obligations to MPI. In
a letter to Burgower dated September 25, 1998, Lopez wrote:
“I…want to certify you [sic] that I, personally, guaranty all outstanding [sic] and
liabilities of Sacos Tubulares with Material Partnerships as well as future
shipments.”
page-pf3
Lopez drafted the letter himself and signed it over the designation “Jorge Lopez Venture,
General Manager” on the manufacturer’s letterhead. After receiving the September 25 letter,
MPI resumed shipping product to Sacos, sending additional shipments valued at approximately
$200,000. MPI subsequently received one payment of approximately $60,000 from Sacos.
When Sacos did not pay for the additional shipments, MPI stopped shipping to Sacos. The
Sacos plant closed and MPI brought suit in a Texas court against Lopez, claiming he was
individually liable for the corporate debt of over $900,000 under the terms of the personal
guarantee. Lopez contended that he signed the letter in his capacity as general manager of
Sacos as a corporate guarantee and that it was not an enforceable personal guarantee. MPI
contended that the letter was a clear personal guarantee.
ISSUE: Is Lopez bound in a personal capacity for the debt of Sacos, even though his
letter was written on Sacos’ letterhead and his signature was followed by the
designation “General Manager”?
HOLDING: Yes, Lopez’s letter unambiguously expressed intent to be bound by a guaranty and
REASONING: The essential terms of a guarantee agreement required by the statute of frauds were present in
this case. Lopez states in his September 25 letter that “I, personally, guaranty” manifesting an
intent to guarantee; and described the obligation being guaranteed as “all outstandings and
liabilities of Sacos,” as well as “future shipments.” Lopez’s signature over his corporate office
does not render the document ambiguous because the clear intent was expressed in the word
“personally.”
4. Promise by the executor or administrator of a decedent’s estate to pay a claim against the estate
from personal funds
6. Sale of goods
a. Price of $500 ($5,000 revised UCC) or more
7. Promissory estoppel
C. What satisfies the statute of frauds
1. Note or memo
a. Can combine various documents and can now be electronic or via fax
2. Signing
a. Check for local statutes that may be different than material in the text
b. If the subject matter of the contract is one that must be in writing under the statute of frauds,
many states require that the authority of an agent executing the contract on behalf of a principal
3. Content
a. Include all material terms
4. Time of writing – can be contemporaneous or subsequent to negotiations
D. The effect of noncompliance with the statute of frauds
page-pf4
1. Contract that should be in writing under the statute of frauds but is oral is a unenforceable contract
2. Explain that the statute of frauds is used as a defense to a lawsuit and not as an offense. For
example, S owns a lot that B wishes to purchase. They enter into a verbal contract whereby B will
deliver $6,000 at noon on Friday to S, and S will provide B with the deed to the property. If either
3. Recovery of value conferred
a. Quasi contract used to help when value has been given pursuant to oral promise
Emphasize that a party who has conferred some benefit on the other party in an attempt to
perform according to the terms of a verbal contract that violates the statute of frauds may
b. Proof of fraud – fraudulently induced another by oral promise
II. What is the Parol Evidence Rule and What Does it Do?
A. Exclusion of parol evidence
1. Parol evidence will not be allowed to modify or contradict the terms of a written contract that is
complete
3. Reason for the parol evidence rule
a. Stability for contracts
4. Conflict between oral and written contracts
a. Reformation possible if mistake
B. Liberalization of parol evidence rule
1. Been relaxed in some jurisdictions
C. When the parol evidence rule does not apply
1. Incomplete contract
2. Ambiguity
page-pf5
Stress that the parol evidence rule does not apply to subsequent agreements. The parties are free
to modify, cancel, and rescind written contracts previously entered into. In addition, emphasize that
a party can always use evidence to prove that no contract exists. The evidence rule is used to
CASE BRIEF: Bourg v. Bristol Boat Co.
705 A. 2d 969 (R.I. 1998)
FACTS: Bourg hired Bristol to construct and deliver a yacht. Bristol did not live up to their promises and
Bourg and Bristol settled the case with Bourg to pay an additional $135,000 for the yacht and
loan Bristol $80,000. Bourg sued after Bristol failed to make the payments and was awarded
$59,081. Bristol appealed.
ISSUE: Was there an enforceable contract?
REASONING: The settlement accompanying the modification was definitive and there was some performance.
6. Illegality
III. What are the Rules of Construction and Interpretation of Contract?
A. Intention of the parties
2. Objective intent
a. What would a reasonable person believe the parties intended?
3. Meaning of words
a. Ordinary words are given ordinary meaning
4. Incorporation by reference
a. Using another document
5. Expectations vs. meaning
B. Whole contract
1. Construe contract so that all parts have effect
2. Divisible contract
With regard to whole contracts and divisible contracts, have the students solve the following
problem. You will probably find a 50/50 split in the class with regard to the solution. This case
becomes an excellent example of how the parties should have clarified their intention at the
beginning of the contract, as this would have saved them extensive legal fees, court time, and grief
in litigating the case. Emphasize that it is often important to spend a few dollars in the beginning and
page-pf6
Holding; divisibility of contracts. No. The contract was to be regarded as divisible, so the obligation
as to one section of land was distinct from the obligation as to the other section. Because the
3. What constitutes the whole contract
a. Separate papers may or may not be part of the contract
CASE BRIEF: C.A. Acquisition Newco, LLC v. DHL Express (USA), Inc.
795 F. Supp. 2d 140 (D. Mass. 2011)
FACTS: C.A. Acquisition Newco, LLC, is a successor in interest to Cyphermint, Inc. (“CI”), a New York
corporation specializing in software development for self-service kiosks. DHL Express (USA),
Inc., is an Ohio corporation with a principal place of business in Florida. It is a division of DHL
International GmBH, a Deutsche Post Company and express carrier of documents and freight.
Until 2008, DHL provided express pick-up and delivery, including same-day air delivery of letters
and packages throughout the United States.
DHL entered into an agreement with Cyphermint, hoping to expand its customer base by
offering domestic shipping services in retail locations, such as Walgreens and OfficeMax, via
kiosks, or “Shipping Spots.” Customers were able to use the kiosks’ touch screen to pay for
shipping costs and print shipping labels. The contract provided for an initial three-year term
(August 1, 2006, through July 31, 2009) that automatically renewed for two more years unless
either party gave notice of its election not to renew 90 days before the end of the initial contract.
Under the contract, Cyphermint agreed to provide interactive software, enabling customers to
use DHL’s services from the shipping spots. Section 10.5 of the contract governs termination
fees:
There shall be no termination fees for any termination by either party, irrespective of
the reason for such termination, except for a “Material Breach” or as provided pursuant
to the “Statement of Work” (SOW).
The SOW contains the following provision concerning termination fees:
Should DHL terminate this agreement for any reason other than a material breach by
Cyphermint before its termination date, DHL agrees to compensate CI in the amount of
$50,000 per month for each month remaining in the initial term.
In November 2008, DHL decided to end all domestic delivery service within the United States.
CI requested early termination fees under Section 10.5 of the contract of $413,333.33. DHL
refused to pay, contending that Section 2.8 of the contract gave DHL the discretion to control
the number and placement of the shipping spots, and when it ended U.S. domestic operations,
it exercised its discretion to reduce shipping spots to zero.
ISSUE: When DHL permanently reduced the shipping spots to zero, did it “terminate the
agreement” under the plain meaning of the language of the contract?
REASONING: Judgment for CI. In reviewing a document, a court must consider the document as a whole,
rather than attempting to isolate certain parts of it. Even if the court were to accept DHL’s
argument that Section 2.8 gave it blanket authority to reduce or eliminate the shipping spot
project altogether, the outcome would remain the same. The relevant provision in the contract
page-pf7
provides for termination fees without regard to whether the termination was authorized. The
only restriction placed on the recovery of such fees is that they will not be available in the case
of a material breach by Cyphermint. DHL failed to explain how reducing the shipping spots to
zero was in any way different from “terminating” the contract.
C. Contradictory and ambiguous terms
1. Use parole evidence – permissible for clarification
CASE BRIEF: Olander Contracting v. Wachter
643 N.W. 2d 29 (2002)
FACTS: Olander Contracting Co., Wachter and the City of Bismark entered into a water and sewer
contract, which among other things called for the construction of a manhole. Olander installed
the manhole, but it collapsed within a few days. It then installed a second manhole with larger
base for greater support, but it also collapsed soon after installation. Olander then constructed
a third manhole with a significantly larger base. It then sued defendants for damages in excess
of $450,000 for extra work claimed to have been required to complete performance on the
contract. Defendants deny responsibility for the amount sued under the contract, arguing the
contract was clear and unambiguous and the claim therefore should be settled as matter of law
in favor of defendants. Plaintiff argues the contract was ambiguous and should be interpreted
by a jury as a question of fact.
ISSUE: Should the jury interpret the contract to determine its meaning?
REASONING: If the intent of the parties can be ascertained from the agreement alone, interpretation of the
contract is a matter of law. However, if the terms of the contract are ambiguous, extrinsic
evidence regarding parties’ intent may be considered, and the terms of the contract and parties’
intent become questions of fact. The contract does not define unforeseen work or extra work,
and does not specify which party is required to pay for such work. Plausible arguments exist for
both positions. Therefore the contract is ambiguous and should be interpreted by a jury.
2. Nature of writing
a. Can be printed, handwritten, or typewritten
3. Ambiguity
a. There can be more than one reasonable interpretation
b. Students sometimes have problems with the concept of ambiguous language. They see a term,
phrase, or clause as having only one meaning and have difficulty realizing that others could
4. Contradictory
a. E.g., 45¢ vs. 90¢ in two different places
5. Strict construction against drafting party
D. Implied terms
1. The parties failed to provide necessary terms
3. Details of performance
page-pf8
a. Trade practices; reasonable
4. Good faith and fair dealing
CASE BRIEF: Holguin v. Dish Network, LLC
178 Cal. Rptr. 3d 100 (Cal. App. 2014)
FACTS: The Holguins ordered a bundle of services from AT&T and affiliates DISH California and
EchoStar consisting of telephone, Internet, and satellite television services, with Deborah
Holguin signing up with the AT&T sales agents. The installation process did not go as planned.
The DISH technician drilled through a sewer pipe in the Holguins’ wall, fed a satellite television
cable through it, and patched the wall without repairing the sewer pipe. The improper installation
was not discovered until 14 months later. The damaged pipe leaked sewer water into the
surrounding wall cavity and caused mold buildup in the Holguins’ home. As a result, the
Holguins suffered respiratory problems and other health issues. The repair efforts were a
nightmare causing the Holguins to hire their own contractor to complete the remediation work.
The Holguins sued AT&T, DISH, and EchoStar for breach of contract. From a judgment for the
Holguins for $109,000 in compensatory damages and attorney fees, the defendants appealed.
ISSUE: Did the trial court err in interpreting the Holguins’ contract to contain an implied term
requiring the Holguins’ satellite television equipment to be properly installed?
REASONING: It is a the well-settled principle that express contractual terms give rise to implied duties,
violations of which may themselves constitute breaches of contract. Accompanying every
contract is a common-law duty to perform with care, skill, reasonable expedience, and
faithfulness the thing agreed to be done, and a negligent failure to observe any of these
conditions is a tort, as well as a breach of the contract.
AUTHORS’ NOTE: The plaintiff vigorously pursued contract damages in this case and the defendants resisted
this theory because the prevailing party was entitled to attorneys’ fees for breach of
contract under the Residential Customer Agreement applicable in this case. The plaintiffs
were not entitled to attorney fees on the tort theories that were also successfully pursued in
this case.
E. Conduct and custom
1. Conduct of the parties
a. Used to determine what contract means
2. Custom and usage of trade
a. Definitions, e.g., “turn key” construction
F. Avoidance of hardship
1. Unfair advantage to one side is avoided
ANSWERS TO QUESTIONS AND CASE PROBLEMS
1. Effect of written contract on prior oral agreement. No. The written contract made by the parties displaced any
prior oral agreement that they may have made with respect to the twenty -foot strip. Consequently, even if
The case involves the ethical values of integrity, truthfulness, and promise keeping. Whether the decision is
ethical presents a difficult question. If in fact the parties made the alleged agreement with respect to the
page-pf9
2. What is required by “evidenced by a writing”. Yes. The requirement that a contract be evidenced by a writing
does not mean that the contract itself must be in writing and signed by both parties. There is evidence of
3. Statute of frauds; promise to pay debt of another. Yes. The widow has the defense that her promise was not
4. Sufficiency of writing. The court held that leaving out the description of the land reserved out of the tract to
5. Primary purpose exception to statute of frauds. Judgment for Freitag. The promise to pay the bills of the
subcontractor was made by the defendants primarily for their benefit in order to keep the work progressing
The ethical values of promise keeping and integrity are involved. The statute of frauds leaves us with the
question of whether it is ethical to require a person to keep a serious promise. Boeing made the promise to
6. Integration of separate writing to satisfy statute of frauds. No. The ad could not be combined with the signed
7. Statute of frauds and contracts that cannot be performed within one year. There is a contract between the
This decision would appear to be unethical, as ethics would require that a person keep a promise made to
another person. This decision is technically correct as a matter of law because it follows the requirements of
the statute of frauds. The legislature is not exclusively concerned with the right and wrong of a given
8. Prenuptial agreements [§ 0]. The record shows that the husband’s net worth, as of 2002, appeared to be
approximately $22,700,000. After eighteen years of marriage and the birth of four children, the husband filed
an action for divorce in 2003 and sought to enforce the prenuptial agreement. The trial court held the
prenuptial agreement enforceable ruling in accordance with the agreement that the wife was entitled to
9. Interpretation according to unambiguous terms. Judgment for PIC. The contract expressly stated that PIC had
unlimited right to sell where it chose. No exception was made that PIC should not sell to established
page-pfa
This case shows that the mere fact that a hardship exists does not determine the result of the case. PIC
acted within the authority of the express terms of the contract. A court could not imply an antihardship
The ethical values of fairness and doing no economic harm are involved in this case. It is uncertain whether
either party thought, at the time of contracting, that the “freedom to sell” provision gave PIC the right to sell to
customers of MECI. Certainly, if MECI thought that this was the case, it would have objected to the provision.
10. Interpretation of contracts. Yes. The condition of “cannot be sold” referred to some condition or circumstance
independent of the parties. Situations may arise in which the seller wants to reserve the right to cancel the
11. Interpretation. The court held that the typewritten provision on payment was inconsistent with the preprinted
12. In corporation by reference. No. Consolidated was not obligated to arbitrate the dispute under paragraph 17.
Mere reference to another document is not sufficient to incorporate that document into the contract absent
13. Meaning of words in a contract. No. The only evidence was that the insured was intoxicated at the time of the
fatal occurrence. This did not affect the liability of the insurer, as it did not prove “alcoholism.” The latter, by
14. Interpretation standards. Judgment for Grove. The Court held that the offer made by Charbonneau was
ambiguous in that it could refer either to making the hole in one as the hole on the first time around the
course, or to making the hole in one in the same cup on the 8 th hole on the second time around the course,
Authors’ Comments: Students may enjoy discussing the correctness of the court’s decision in this case. A
view supporting Charbonneau Buick follows. A contract is ambiguous if the words used can support the two
15. Parol evidence rule § 5. Judgment for Tambe Electric. The parol evidence of an oral condition precedent
page-pfb
[Tambe Electric v. Home Depot, 856 N.Y. S .2d 373)]
LAWFLIX
The Santa Clause (1996) (PG)
When Scott Calvin (Tim Allen) tries on a Santa Claus suit, he discovers that he has assumed all of Santa’s
responsibility. Calvin tries to challenge his acceptance of the terms of the agreement, and the students can
management system for classroom use.

Trusted by Thousands of
Students

Here are what students say about us.

Copyright ©2022 All rights reserved. | CoursePaper is not sponsored or endorsed by any college or university.