Leadership
A. Charismatic Leadership
1. The charismatic leader has the ability to inspire and motivate people to do more than
they would normally do, despite obstacles and personal sacrifice.
2. The impact of charismatic leaders normally come from:
a. stating a lofty vision of an imagined future that employees identify with
b. displaying an ability to understand and empathize with followers
c. empowering and trusting subordinates to accomplish results.
3. Charismatic leaders are often skilled in the art of visionary leadership. A vision is an
attractive, ideal future that is credible yet not readily attainable. Charismatic leaders
have a strong vision for the future, almost an obsession, and they can motivate others
to help realize it.
B. Transformational versus Transactional Leadership
1. Transformational leaders are distinguished by their special ability to bring about
innovation and change. They recognize followers’ needs and concerns, help them
look at old problems in new ways, and encourage them to question the status quo.
2. Transformational leaders create significant change in both followers and the
organization. They have the ability to lead changes in the organization’s mission,
structure, and human resource management. They focus on intangibles, such as
vision, shared values, and ideas to build relationships, give larger meaning to
activities, and enlist followers in change.
3. Studies show that transformational leadership has a positive impact on follower
development and follower performance. Transformational leadership skills can be
learned and are not ingrained personality characteristics.
4. Transactional leaders clarify subordinates’ role and task requirements, initiate
structure, provide appropriate rewards, and try to be considerate and meet the social
needs of subordinates. Transactional leaders excel at management functions, are
hardworking, tolerant, and fair-minded. They stress the impersonal aspects of
performance, such as plans, schedules, and budgets.
Discussion Question #6: What is transformational leadership? Give examples of organizational
situations that would call for transformational, transactional, or charismatic leadership.
NOTES________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Leadership
VIII. FOLLOWERSHIP Exhibit 11.10
Many of the qualities that define a good leader are the same qualities as those possessed by a
good follower. One model of followership involves five follower styles, categorized according
to two dimensions.
A. The first dimension is the quality of independent, critical thinking versus dependent,
uncritical thinking. Independent critical thinkers are mindful of the effects of their own
and others’ behavior on achieving organizational goals. They can weigh the impact of
their boss’s and their own decisions and offer constructive criticism, creativity, and
innovation. A dependent, uncritical thinker does not consider possibilities beyond what
he or she is told, does not contribute to the cultivation of the organization, and accepts the
supervisor’s ideas without thinking.
B. The second dimension is active versus passive behavior. An active follower participates
fully in the organization, engages in behavior that is beyond the limits of the job,
demonstrates a sense of ownership, and initiates problem solving and decision making.
A passive follower is characterized by a need for constant supervision and prodding by
supervisors.
C. The combinations of critical thinker/uncritical thinker and active/passive behavior result
in five types of followers.
1. The alienated follower is a passive but independent, critical thinker. Alienated
employees are often effective followers who have experienced setbacks and
obstacles, perhaps promises broken by their superiors.
2. The conformist participates actively in a relationship with the boss but doesn’t use
critical thinking skills. A conformist typically carries out any and all orders
regardless of the nature of the request.
3. The pragmatic survivor has qualities of all four extremes, depending on which style
fits with the prevalent situation. This type of person uses whatever style best benefits
his or her own position and minimizes risk.
4. The passive follower exhibits neither critical, independent thinking nor active
participation. Being passive and uncritical, these people show neither initiative nor a
sense of responsibility.
5. The effective follower is both a critical, independent thinker and active in the
organization. Effective followers behave the same toward everyone, regardless of
their position in the organization.
NEWMANAGER SELF-TEST: WHAT IS YOUR FOLLOWER STYLE?
Effective followers recognize that they have power in their relationships with superiors; thus,
they have the courage to manage upward, to initiate change, and even to put themselves at risk or
in conflict with the boss if they believe that it serves the best interest of the team or organization.
Leadership
Students can assess their followership style and think about what they might do to be more
effective as a follower.
Discussion Question #8: Why do you think so little attention is given to followership compared to
leadership in organizations? Discuss how the role of an effective follower is similar to the role
of a leader.
NOTES_______________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
IX. POWER AND INFLUENCE
Power is the potential ability to influence the behavior of others. Influence is the effect of a
person’s actions on the attitudes, values, beliefs, or behavior of others. Power is the capacity to
cause a change in a person; influence may be thought of as the degree of actual change. Power
results from an interaction of leader and followers.
Sometimes power comes from a person’s position in the organization, while other sources of
power are based on personal characteristics. Within organizations, there are typically five
sources of power: legitimate, reward, coercive, expert, and referent.
A. Hard Position Power
1. The traditional manager’s power comes from the organization. The manager’s
position gives him or her power to reward or punish subordinates to influence
behavior. Examples of position power include:
a. Legitimate power comes from a formal management position in an organization
and the authority granted to it. Subordinates accept this source of power as
legitimate, which is why they comply.
b. Reward power stems from the manager’s authority to bestow rewards on other
people. Legitimate power and reward power are most likely to generate
compliance.
c. Coercive power is the opposite of reward power. Here, the manager has the
authority to punish or recommend punishment, which often generates resistance.
Resistance means workers tend to try to avoid carrying out instructions or will
attempt to disobey them.
B. Personal Soft Power
1. Personal power often comes from internal sources, such as a person’s special
knowledge or personality. Examples of personal power include:
a. Expert power results from a leader’s special knowledge or skill regarding the
tasks performed by followers.
Leadership
b. Referent power comes from leader personality characteristics that command
subordinates’ identification, respect, and admiration so they wish to emulate the
leader. Subordinate response will be commitment, which means subordinates will
enthusiastically carry out instructions. Leaders can increase their referent power
when they share power and authority with employees. A significant trend is to
empower lower employees.
Discussion Question #9: Do you think leadership is more important or less important in today’s
flatter, team-based organizations? Are some leadership styles better suited to such
organizations as opposed to traditional hierarchical organizations? Explain.
NOTES________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
C. Other Sources of Power
1. Personal effort results in gaining power when people show initiative, work beyond
what is expected of them, take on undesirable but important projects, and show
interest in learning about the organization and industry.
2. People who are enmeshed in a network of relationships have greater power.
3. Information is a primary business resource, and people who have access to
information and control over how and to whom it is distributed are typically
powerful.
D. Interpersonal Influence Tactics Exhibit 11.11
1. Leaders often use a combination of influence strategies, and people who are
perceived as having greater power and influence typically are those who use a wider
variety of tactics. There are six principles for asserting influence.
a. Use rational persuasion. Use facts, data, and logical argument to persuade others.
b. Help people like you. People would rather say yes to someone they like than to
someone they don’t like.
c. Rely on the rule of reciprocity. Take advantage of the exchange of benefits and
favors.
d. Develop allies. Develop networks of alliespeople who can help you
accomplish your goals.
e. Ask for what you want. Make a direct and personal request.
Leadership
f. Appeal to higher authority. Gain the support of people at higher levels to back
you up.
SUGGESTED ANSWERS TO ENDOF-CHAPTER DISCUSSION
QUESTIONS
1. Suggest some personal traits that you believe would be useful to a business leader today.
Are these traits more valuable in some situations than in others? How do you think traits
differ from strengths?
2. In a study asking what people wanted from leaders versus followers, people ranked maturity
number 8 for followers, but number 15 for leaders. What might account for people wanting a
higher maturity level from followers?
3. If a male manager changes his behaviors to incorporate elements of interactive leadership
more common to female managers, can he still be an “authentic” leader? Discuss.
© 2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
4. Studies of women leaders suggest that many of them view power differently than men do and
prefer a collaborative, relationship-oriented use of power. If this is the case, what does it
suggest about women leaders’ abilities to accomplish goals? What does it suggest about
women’s ability to rise to higher organizational levels? Discuss.
5. What skills and abilities does a manager need to lead effectively in a virtual environment?
Do you believe a leader with a consideration style or an initiating-structure style would be
more successful as a virtual leader? Explain your answer.
The point of this question is that no one style is preferable to another. Consideration is the extent
to which the leader respects subordinates’ ideas and feelings, provides open communication,
6. What is transformational leadership? Give examples of organizational situations that would
© 2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
7. How does Level 5 leadership differ from the concept of servant leadership? Do you believe
anyone has the potential to become a Level 5 leader? Discuss.
8. Why do you think so little attention is given to followership compared to leadership in
organizations? Discuss how the role of an effective follower is similar to the role of a leader.
9. Do you think leadership is more important or less important in today’s flatter, team-based
organizations? Are some leadership styles better suited to such organizations as opposed to
traditional hierarchical organizations? Explain.
© 2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
leadership styles that are more people oriented are better suited to team-based organizations
because of the increased need for coordination and empowerment.
10. Consider the leadership position of a senior partner in a law firm. What task, subordinate,
and organizational factors might serve as substitutes for leadership in this situation?
Macro variables such as formalization, inflexibility, and physical separation probably would not
APPLY YOUR SKILLS: SELF-LEARNING
What Is the Impact of Leadership?
The questions in this exercise relate to the “romance” of leadership, which is the romantic view
that leaders are very responsible for organizational performance, while ignoring other factors
such as economic conditions. Company performance is difficult to control and is an outcome of
complex forces. After completing the questions, students should discuss their scores and their
beliefs about leadership with a partner.
APPLY YOUR SKILLS: GROUP LEARNING
Assumptions about Leaders
Students are asked to complete sentences based on their views on leadership. Then in groups,
students discuss what they’ve learned about their assumptions about leadership and how these
assumptions relate to the theories of leadership discussed in the chapter.
APPLY YOUR SKILLS: ETHICAL DILEMMA
Too Much of a Good Thing?
1. Tell Carolyn Clark that employee volunteerism is important to the company and that while
her performance evaluation will not be affected by her decision, she should consider helping
Harris because it is an opportunity to help a worthy community project.
© 2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
2. Tell Darius Harris that the employee volunteer program is just that: a volunteer program.
Even though the company sees volunteerism as an important piece of its campaign to repair
its tarnished image, employees must be free to choose whether to volunteer. He should not
ask for the help of his direct reports with the after-school program.
3. Discipline Darius Harris for coercing his subordinates to spend their own time on his
volunteer work at the community after-school program. This action will send a signal that
coercing employees is a clear violation of leadership authority.
APPLY YOUR SKILLS: CASE FOR CRITICAL ANALYSIS
“What’s Wrong with the Team?”
1. How would you characterize Rankin’s leadership style? What approach do you think is
correct for this situation? Why?
2. What would you do now if you were Rankin? How might you awaken more enthusiasm in
your team for completing this project on time? Suggest specific steps.
Leadership
© 2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
The charismatic leader has the ability to inspire and motivate people to do more than what they
would normally do, despite obstacles and personal sacrifice. Following are some of the ways that
Rankin can be a charismatic leader:
a. Stating a lofty vision of an imagined future that employees identify with
b. Displaying an ability to understand and empathize with followers
c. Empowering and trusting subordinates to accomplish results
Charismatic leaders are often skilled in the art of visionary leadership. A vision is an attractive,
ideal future that is credible yet not readily attainable. Charismatic leaders have a strong vision for
the future, almost an obsession, and they can motivate others to help realize it.
Transformational leaders are distinguished by their special ability to bring about innovation and
change. They recognize followers’ needs and concerns, help them look at old problems in new
ways, and encourage them to question the status quo. Transformational leaders create significant
change in both followers and the organization. They have the ability to lead changes in the
organization’s mission, structure, and human resource management. They focus on intangibles,
such as vision, shared values, and ideas to build relationships, give larger meaning to activities,
and enlist followers in change.
Studies show that transformational leadership has a positive impact on follower development and
follower performance. Transformational leadership skills can be learned and are not ingrained
personality characteristics.
3. How would you suggest that Rankin modify his leadership style if he wants to succeed Dyer
in two years? Be specific.
ON THE JOB VIDEO CASE ANSWERS
Camp Bow Wow: Leadership
1. Does Camp Bow Wow CEO Heidi Ganahl possess qualities associated with contemporary
leadership?
2. In what way is Heidi Ganahl’s leadership charismatic and visionary? Give examples.
3. Where does Heidi Ganahl’s leadership fall on the Leadership Grid discussed in this chapter
and illustrated in Exhibit 11.6? Explain.