CHAPTER 11
LEADERSHIP
CHAPTER OUTLINE
New Manager Self-Test: Task versus People Orientation
I. The Nature of Leadership
II. Contemporary Leadership
A. Level 5 Leadership
B. Servant Leadership
C. Authentic Leadership
D. Gender Differences
III. From Management to Leadership
IV. Leadership Traits
V. Behavioral Approaches
A. Task versus People
B. The Leadership Grid
VI. Contingency Approaches
A. The Situational Model of Leadership
B. Fiedler’s Contingency Theory
C. Situational Substitutes for Leadership
VII. Charismatic and Transformational Leadership
A. Charismatic Leadership
B. Transformational versus Transactional Leadership
VIII. Followership
New Manager Self-Test: What Is Your Follower Style?
IX. Power and Influence
A. Hard Position Power
B. Personal Soft Power
C. Other Sources of Power
D. Interpersonal Influence Tactics
ANNOTATED LEARNING OUTCOMES
After studying this chapter, students should be able to:
1. Define leadership and explain its importance for organizations.
There is probably no topic more important to business success today than leadership. Leadership
© 2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
the use of power. Power is the potential ability to influence the behavior of others. Power
represents the resources with which a leader effects changes in employee behavior.
2. Describe the leadership trends emerging in today’s organizations, including Level 5
leadership, servant leadership, and authentic leadership.
The turbulence and uncertainty of the environment in which most organizations are operating has
3. Discuss how women’s style of leading is typically different from men’s.
Some of the characteristics associated with Level 5 leaders and authentic leaders are also
hallmarks of interactive leadership, which has been found to be associated with female leaders.
© 2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
4. Identify personal characteristics associated with effective leaders.
Traits are the distinguishing personal characteristics of a leader such as intelligence, values, self-
confidence, and appearance. In addition to personality traits, physical, social, and work-related
5. Define task-oriented behavior and people-oriented behavior and explain how these
categories are used to evaluate and adapt leadership style.
Task-oriented behavior and people-oriented behavior are two basic categories of behavior
identified as important for leadership. People-oriented behavior is the extent to which the leader
6. Describe the situational model of leadership and its application to subordinate participation.
The situational model of leadership, which originated with Hersey and Blanchard, focuses a
great deal of attention on the characteristics of employees in determining appropriate leadership
7. Discuss how leadership fits the organizational situation and how organizational
characteristics can substitute for leadership behaviors.
The organizational situation or variables can be so powerful that they actually substitute for, or
8. Describe transformational leadership and when it should be used.
Managers deal with organizational complexity; leaders initiate productive change.
9. Explain how followership is related to effective leadership.
Many of the qualities that define a good leader are the same qualities as those possessed by a
10. Identify sources of leader power and the tactics that leaders use to influence others.
Power is the potential ability to influence the behavior of others. Power represents the resources
with which a leader effects changes in employee behavior. Within organizations there are
Leadership
© 2017 Cengage Learning®. May not be scanned, copied or duplicated, or posted to a publicly accessible website, in whole or in part.
Be assertiveask for what you want.
Make use of higher authority.
LECTURE OUTLINE
NEW MANAGER SELF-TEST: TASK VERSUS PEOPLE ORIENTATION
The majority of a new manager’s work is accomplished through interpersonal relationships.
Many new managers aspire to a high sociability and high dominance pattern of interpersonal
relationships. Students can diagnose their approach to dealing with others when they are in a
leadership role. A People Orientation score reveals a student’s orientation toward people and
relationships, A Task Orientation score reveals a student’s orientation toward tasks and
outcomes.
I. THE NATURE OF LEADERSHIP
There is probably no topic more important to business success than leadership because it occurs
among people, involves influence, and is used to attain goals. Influence means that the
relationship among people is not passive. Influence is designed to achieve some end or goal.
Leadership is defined as the ability to influence people toward the attainment of goals.
Leadership is reciprocal, occurring among people. It is dynamic and involves the use of power
to get things done.
II. CONTEMPORARY LEADERSHIP
The turbulence and uncertainty of the environment in which most corporations are operating in
today’s world have had a significant influence on leadership thinking and styles. Ethical and
economic difficulties, corporate governance concerns, globalization, changes in technology, new
ways of working, shifting employee expectations, and significant social transitions have
contributed to a shift in how we think about and practice leadership.
A. Level 5 Leadership Exhibit 11.1
1. A key characteristic of Level 5 leaders is an almost complete lack of ego, coupled
with a fierce resolve to do what is best for the organization. In contrast to the view of
great leaders as larger-than-life personalities with strong egos and big ambitions,
Level 5 leaders often seem shy and unpretentious. Humility means being
unpretentious and modest rather than arrogant and prideful. Although they accept full
responsibility for mistakes, poor results, or failures, Level 5 leaders give credit for
successes to other people.
B. Servant Leadership
1. Servant leaders operate on two levels: for the fulfillment of the subordinates’ goals
and needs and for the realization of the larger purpose or mission of their
Leadership
organization. Servant leaders give things awaypower, ideas, information,
recognition, and credit for accomplishment. Servant leaders bring the follower’s
higher motives to the work and connect them to the organizational mission and goals.
Servant leaders often work in the nonprofit world because it offers a natural way to
apply their leadership drive and skills to serve others.
C. Authentic Leadership Exhibit 11.2
1. Authentic leadership refers to individuals who know and understand themselves,
who espouse and act consistently with higher-order ethical values, and who empower
and inspire others with their openness and authenticity.
a. Authentic leaders pursue their purpose with passion. When leaders demonstrate a
high level of passion and commitment to purpose, they inspire commitment from
followers.
b. Authentic leaders practice solid values. People come to know what the leader
stands for, which inspires trust.
c. Authentic leaders lead with their hearts as well as with their heads. They
maintain compassion for others as well as the courage to make difficult decisions.
d. Authentic leaders establish connected relationships. They surround themselves
with good people and work to help others grow and develop.
e. Authentic leaders demonstrate self-discipline. They avoid excessive or unethical
risks that could harm others and the organization, and openly admit their
mistakes.
D. Gender Differences Exhibit 11.3
1. Some of the characteristics associated with Level 5 leaders and authentic leaders are
also hallmarks of interactive leadership, which has been found to be associated with
female leaders. Interactive leadership means that the leader favors a consensual and
collaborative process, and influence derives from relationships rather than position
power and formal authority.
2. According to surveys, women rate higher than men on motivating others, fostering
communication, driving results, producing high-quality work, and listening to others,
while men and women rate about equally on strategic planning and analyzing issues.
III. FROM MANAGEMENT TO LEADERSHIP Exhibit 11.4
Management and leadership are both important to organizations. Effective managers must also
be leaders because of distinctive qualities associated with each that provide different strengths
for the organization. Management and leadership reflect two different sets of qualities and skills
that frequently overlap within a single individual. A person may have more of one set of
Leadership
qualities than the other, but ideally a manager develops a balance of both manager and leader
qualities.
A primary distinction between management and leadership is that management promotes
stability, order, and problem solving within the existing organizational structures and systems.
Leadership promotes vision, creativity, and change. It means questioning the status quo so that
outdated, unproductive, or socially irresponsible norms can be replaced.
Leadership cannot replace management. Good management helps the organization meet current
commitments, while good leadership moves the organization into the future.
IV. LEADERSHIP TRAITS Exhibit 11.5
Early efforts to understand leadership focused on the leader’s personal characteristics or traits.
Traits are the distinguishing personal characteristics of a leader, such as intelligence, honesty,
self-confidence, and appearance.
Generally, research found only a weak relationship between personal traits and leader success.
Physical, social, and work-related characteristics of leaders have also been studied. The
appropriateness of a trait or set of traits depends on the leadership situation. The same traits do
not apply to every organization or situation.
Rather than just understanding their traits, the best leaders recognize and hone their strengths.
Strengths are natural talents and abilities that have been supported and reinforced with learned
knowledge and skills and provide each individual with his or her best tools for accomplishment
and satisfaction.
Discussion Question #1: Suggest some personal traits that you believe would be useful to a
business leader today. Are these traits more valuable in some situations than in others? How do
you think traits differ from strengths?
NOTES________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
V. BEHAVIORAL APPROACHES
A. Task versus People
1. The inability to define effective leadership based solely on traits led to an interest in
looking at the behavior of leaders and how it might contribute to leader success. Two
basic leadership behaviors that have been identified as important for leadership are
task-oriented behavior and people-oriented behavior.
a. Studies of leader behavior at The Ohio State University identified two major
leadership behaviors called consideration and initiating structure.
Leadership
Consideration is the extent to which the leader is sensitive to subordinates,
respects their ideas and feelings, and establishes mutual trust. Considerate
leaders are friendly, provide open communication, develop teamwork, and are
oriented toward their subordinates’ welfare.
Initiating structure is the extent to which a leader is task oriented and directs
subordinate activities toward goal attainment. Leaders with this style
typically give instructions, spend time planning, emphasize deadlines, and
provide schedules of work activities.
b. Studies at the University of Michigan compared the behavior of effective and
ineffective supervisors.
Employee-centered leaders were the effective leaders who established high
performance goals and displayed supportive behavior toward subordinates.
Job-centered leaders were ineffective and less concerned with goal
achievement and human needs in favor of meeting schedules, keeping costs
low, and achieving efficiency.
B. The Leadership Grid Exhibit 11.6
1. Researchers at the University of Texas developed the Leadership Grid®, a
two-dimensional model that measures concern for people and for production. Each
axis on the grid is a nine-point scale, with 1 meaning low concern and 9 meaning high
concern.
a. Team management (9,9) is often considered the most effective style for all
managers; organization members work together to accomplish task outcomes.
b. Country-club management (1,9) occurs when primary emphasis is given to people
rather than to work outputs.
c. Authority-compliance management (9,1) occurs when efficiency in operations is
the dominant orientation.
d. Middle-of-the-road management (5,5) reflects a moderate concern for both people
and production.
e. Impoverished management (1,1) means the absence of a management philosophy;
managers exert little effort toward interpersonal relationships or work
accomplishment.
NOTES________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
Leadership
VI. CONTINGENCY APPROACHES
A. The Situational Model of Leadership Exhibit 11.7
1. The situational model of leadership, which originated with Hersey and Blanchard, is
a contingency approach to leadership. That is, it describes the relationship between
leadership styles and specific organizational situations. The situational model links
the leader’s behavioral style with the task of readiness of subordinates.
2. The focus of this model is that subordinates vary in their readiness level, which is
determined by the degree of willingness and ability a subordinate demonstrates while
performing a specific task.
a. Willingness refers to a combination of confidence, commitment, and motivation,
and a follower may be high or low on any of the three variables.
b. Ability refers to the amount of knowledge, experience, and demonstrated skill a
subordinate brings to the task.
People low in readiness need a different leadership style than those with high
readiness. People have low task readiness due to limited skills, lack of training, or
insecurity. People with high readiness tend to have ability, skills, confidence, and
willingness to work.
3. According to the situational model, a leader can adopt one of four leadership styles,
based on relationship (concern for people) and task (concern for production)
behavior. The four styles include:
a. Directing stylea highly dictating style and involves giving explicit directions
about how tasks should be accomplished.
b. Coaching stylea leader explains decisions and gives subordinates a chance to
ask questions and gain clarity and understanding about work tasks.
c. Supporting stylea leader shares ideas with subordinates, gives them a chance to
participate, and facilitates decision making.
d. Entrusting style a leader turns over the responsibility for decisions and their
implementation to subordinates.
4. Followers may be at low, moderate, or high levels of readiness.
a. Low Readiness Level. A directing style is appropriate when followers are at a
low readiness level because of poor ability and skills, little experience, insecurity,
or unwillingness. The leader directs followers what to do, how to do it, and when
to do it.
Leadership
b. Moderate Readiness Level. A coaching style works best with moderate levels of
readiness when subordinates are unable but willing to follow. In this case,
subordinates might lack some education and experience for the job. The coaching
style gives direction but includes seeking input from others and clarifying tasks.
c. Moderate Readiness Level. A supporting style is effective with moderate levels
of readiness when subordinates are able but lack high willingness to follow.
These subordinates are somewhat insecure about their abilities, and the leader acts
as a resource for advice and assistance to them.
d. High Readiness Level. When followers have high levels of education,
experience, and readiness to accept responsibility for their own task behavior, the
entrusting style is effective. For these followers, the leader provides a general
goal, delegates sufficient authority to do the task, and expects followers to
complete the task as they see fit.
B. Fiedler’s Contingency Theory Exhibit 11.8
The cornerstone of Fiedler’s contingency theory is the extent to which the leader’s style is
relationship oriented or task oriented. A relationship-oriented leader is concerned with
people. A task-oriented leader is primarily motivated by task accomplishment.
1. Situation: Favorable or Unfavorable?
a. The suitability of a person’s leadership style is determined by whether the
situation is favorable or unfavorable. Since leadership styles are considered to be
difficult to change, the basic idea is to match the leader’s style with the situation
most favorable for his or her effectiveness. The favorability of a leadership
situation can be analyzed in terms of three elements: the quality of relationships
between leader and followers, the degree of task structure, and the extent to which
the leader has formal authority over followers.
Highly favorable when the leader-member relations are positives, tasks are
highly structured, and the leader has formal authority over followers.
Highly unfavorable when leader-member relations are poor, tasks are highly
unstructured, and the leader has little formal authority.
NOTES________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
2. Matching Leader Style to the Situation
a. Combining the three characteristics yields eight leadership situations.
The task-oriented leader excels in most favorable situations because everyone
gets along, the task is clear, and the leader has power. The task-oriented
Leadership
leader also excels in most unfavorable situations because a great deal of
structure and task direction is needed.
The relationship-oriented leader performs better in the four situations of
intermediate favorability because human relations skills are important in
achieving high group performance.
b. A leader needs to know two things to use Fiedler’s contingency theory.
A leader needs to know whether he or she has a relationship- or task-oriented
style.
A leader should diagnose the situation and determine whether leader-member
relations, task structure, and position power are favorable or unfavorable.
C. Situational Substitutes for Leadership Exhibit 11.9
1. The contingency leadership approaches considered so far have focused on the
leader’s style, the subordinates’ nature, and the situation’s characteristics. The final
contingency approach suggests that situational variables can be so powerful that they
substitute for, or neutralize, the need for leadership.
a. A substitute is a situational variable that makes a leadership style redundant or
unnecessary. Highly professional subordinates do not need a leader to tell them
what to do.
b. A neutralizer is a situational variable that prevents a leader from displaying
certain behaviors. Situational variables include characteristics of the subordinate,
task, and the organization.
2. Leaders should adopt a style complementary to the organizational situation to ensure
that both task needs and people needs of the work group are met.
Discussion Question #10: Consider the leadership position of a senior partner in a law firm.
What task, subordinate, and organizational factors might serve as substitutes for leadership in
this situation?
NOTES________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
______________________________________________________________________________
VII. CHARISMATIC AND TRANSFORMATIONAL LEADERSHIP
Research has found that some leadership approaches are more effective than others for bringing
about change in organizations. Two types of leadership that can have a substantial impact are
charismatic leadership and transformational leadership. These are best understood in comparison
to transactional leadership.