The World of Innovative Management •
include the human relations movement, the human resources perspective, and the
behavioral sciences approach.
A. Early Advocates
1. Mary Parker Follett (1868–1933) stressed the importance of people rather than
engineering techniques and addressed ethics, power, and empowerment. Her
concepts included facilitating rather than controlling employees, and allowing
employees to act according to the situation.
2. Chester I. Barnard (1886–1961) contributed the concept of the informal
organization, which occurs in all formal organizations and includes cliques
and social groupings. Barnard argued that organizations were not machines
and that informal relationships are powerful forces that can help the
organization if properly managed. Barnard also contributed the acceptance
theory of authority—the notion that employees have free will and can choose
whether to follow management orders. Acceptance of authority can be critical
to success in important situations.
B. Human Relations Movement
1. The human relations movement was based on the idea that truly effective
control comes from within the individual worker rather than from strict,
authoritarian control. This school of thought recognized and directly
responded to social pressures for enlightened treatment of employees. The
human relations movement emphasized satisfaction of employees’ basic needs
as the key to increased worker productivity.
2. The Hawthorne studies were a series of experiments on worker productivity
at the Hawthorne plant of Western Electric Company, Chicago. The tests
were originally designed to investigate the effects of illumination on output;
however, many of the tests pointed to the importance of factors other than
illumination in affecting productivity. The Hawthorne studies were important
in shaping ideas concerning how managers should treat workers.
3. Early interpretations agreed that human relations, not money, caused
increased output. Workers performed better when managers treated them
positively. New data showed that money mattered, but productivity increased
because of increased feelings of importance and group pride employees felt
when they were selected for the project.
4. One unintended contribution of the experiments was a rethinking of field
research practices. Researchers realized that the researcher could influence
the outcome of an experiment by being too involved with research subjects—a
phenomenon now known as the Hawthorne effect.