Polaris and Victory:
Entering and Growing the Motorcycle Business
3
Polaris and Victory
product lines commanded attention from Polaris decision makers. Essentially, Polaris was
certain that offering another American branded product to meet excess domestic demand
would be an advantage over foreign-produced motorcycles. In addition, Polaris believed
it could design and deliver a superior cruiser that would eliminate the common practice of
replacing many components (such as brakes, seats, wheels, vibration-adsorption devices,
frame stiffeners, and intake systems) on their brand-new motorcycles immediately after
purchase.
• In what ways was Polaris successful with the introduction of the Victory product
line? What did the company do wrong?
With experienced researchers, and by drawing from all corners of the industry,
Polaris executed a thorough, methodical, and analytical entry into its new business.
Adding the motorcycle line to its portfolio enabled Polaris to balance seasonal production
cycles for increased operational efficiencies and to expand into a related engine business,
which added potential for an extended product line. In addition to production synergies,
the move also provided cross-selling opportunities to a network of over 2,000 Polaris
dealers.
Polaris invested $100 million in the development of the Victory motorcycle. As
cruiser industry sales doubled from 1993 to 1997, the company fully expected to recoup
its investment within three years. However, Polaris entered the market at the tail end of
the expansion period. Consequently, it was 2006 before Polaris turned a profit on the new
line. Sales peaked during 2006-2007 and then fell to 2003 levels. As of 2010, sales levels
had yet to meet Polaris’ expectations. Using the estimates below, sales were still short of
Polaris’ 4,000 unit breakeven point and were failing to meet the company’s targeted goal
of capturing 5% (or $150 million) of the estimated global market.