cost. This ratio should be 1 under PPP. Differential costs of the Big Mac over
time and across nations should be related to changes in currency values as PPP
tends to push prices up or down to one price.
o Inflation and PPP. PPP posits that exchange rate changes are explained by
relative prices across countries. Empirical tests of PPP have found mixed results.
While PPP appears to hold for periods exceeding five years, it may not hold in
shorter periods. For countries with large price disparities due to inflation or other
reasons, PPP is predictive of exchange rate movements. For other countries with
little difference in inflation rates, PPP is less reliable. Some of the problems that
explain the failure of PPP include transportation costs and trade barriers,
government interventions, and MNCs with pricing power on a global basis. The
value of a country’s currency is attributable to more than the difference in price
levels between countries. Market expectations about economic growth, global
competitiveness, monetary and fiscal policy, and many other factors could affect
a country’s currency value.
• Interest Rate Parity (IRP). Relative interest rates on financial securities are another
possible determinant of exchange rate changes. Under the law of one price, the rates of
return on different countries’ government bonds of similar maturity and risk should be
comparable. According to interest rate parity theory, the interest rate on such bonds
should be the same. Otherwise there would be arbitrage opportunities for investors to
purchase the higher interest rate bond and sell the lower interest rate bond to make
riskless profits. According to the uncovered interest rate parity theory, it is possible that
the expected future spot rate is not equal to the forward exchange rate. This difference is
possible if a risk premium exists in expected future spot rates due to risk-averse investor
behavior. IRP argues that the interest rate earned on assets in different countries will tend
toward equality after taking into account exchange rate changes. If IRP does not hold,
global capital flows will take place to arbitrage away excess profit opportunities in
international investments.
o Problems with IRP. Empirical evidence on IRP theories is mixed. Transaction
cost is one possible impediment to IRP. As the investment time horizon
increases, deviations from IRP may be more likely due to political risk, legal