advances that the suppliers may have. Another disadvantage of making is that the
“internal suppliers” may not have the incentive to improve their product since
they do not face competition. Companies sometimes resort to dual sourcing, or
producing in-house and purchasing from suppliers the components they need.
This provides the motivation to their internal suppliers to be as efficient as
external suppliers. Another disadvantage of making is that the firm may not be
able to gain the economies of scale that can be gained by a large supplier.
Additionally, by making, a firm could increase the complexity of its production
process. Lastly, a strategic disadvantage of making is that the firm incurs both
fixed and variable costs, while when buying, the firm only incurs variable costs.
This financial flexibility may prove crucial when fixed costs are considerable.
V. Location Decision. Once a business decides which components and raw materials will
be made in-house, a location decision will need to be made. This consists of determining if the
making will be done at one or more production facilities, and if these facilities should be located
in one or more countries. Businesses face the one-versus-many production facilities decision
when making location decisions.
• Location of Production Facilities for Components and Raw Materials. One
consideration for the one-versus-many production facilities decision is fixed costs. When
fixed costs are high, one production facility will be favored. Another consideration is the
notion of the minimum efficient scale and its comparison to demand. As volume
increases, unit costs decrease due to economies of scale and scope and learning curve
effects. However, there is a volume value called the minimum efficient scale, or the
point at which unit costs stabilize. When demand is equal to or lower than the minimum
efficient scale, one production facility location is preferred. When demand is higher,
several production facilities are economically feasible. The value-to-weight ratio is
another consideration. Goods with high value-to-weight ratios are expensive but do not
weigh very much. Goods with high value-to-weight ratios favor a single location to use
advantages of centralized production, while with low value-to-weight products it’s best
to have many production facilities close to the places where these components are
needed. Companies also need to consider the Heckscher-Ohlin Model in deciding in