Chapter 14/The Case for Free Markets: The Price System
Both proposals may be unfair to the poor, because they have less discretionary income
2.Using the concepts of marginal cost (MC) and marginal utility (MU), discuss the nature
of the inefficiency in each of the following cases:
a. An arrangement that offers relatively little coffee and much tea to people who
prefer coffee and does the reverse for tea lovers
b. An arrangement in which skilled mechanics are assigned to ditch digging and
unskilled laborers to repairing cars
c. An arrangement that produces a large quantity of trucks and few cars, assuming
that both cost about the same amount to produce and to run but that most people
in the community prefer cars to trucks
(a) Both tea lovers and coffee lovers could be made better off, and no one would be
worse off, if the tea lovers swapped coffee for tea with the coffee lovers. Therefore
3. In reality, which of the following circumstances might give rise to each of the
situations described in Discussion Question 2?
a. Regulation of output quantities by a government
b. Rationing of commodities
c. Assignment of soldiers to different jobs in an army
(a) If the government regulates output quantities, it may decree quantities that differ from
the community’s preferences, for example, too many trucks and not enough cars.
4. We have said that the economy’s three coordination tasks are output selection,
production planning, and product distribution. Which of these is done badly in the
cases described in Discussion Questions 2a, 2b, and 2c?
Question 2(a) is a case of the inefficient distribution of product. Question 2(b) is a case of